CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD001658009

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2016

8 novembre 2016

    If a defendant fails to appear in court because he was not duly notified of the time and place, the court shall adjourn the hearing.

Page 59 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD005364909

Admin. suprême

19 février 2015

19 février 2015

It also awarded the applicant the costs incurred in serving the official notice because they had resulted from the actions of the company and the agency. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0907DEC003317902

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2004

7 septembre 2004

They pointed out that the boy, who was two months old, had been admitted to the hospital because he was emaciated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC000596402

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2004

8 juillet 2004

On 7 and 28 October 2002 the scheduled hearings did not take place because the applicant was ill.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928DEC003997298

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 1999

28 septembre 1999

He then asked for a further adjournment because he was taken up with another hearing in a different case before another President of the District Court of Limassol.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175825

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2017

29 juin 2017

conflict between E. and herself and not because of her mental disorder, so the disorder did not make her a danger to others.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0130DEC005953200

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2003

30 janvier 2003

    The applicant also complains that her right to property was violated because she was deprived of a possibility to buy the flat in question.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0426JUD004045798

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2001

26 avril 2001

    The first hearing, initially scheduled for 19 June 1992, was postponed to 10 October 1992 because of a lawyers’ strike. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD004990614

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2025

15 mai 2025

Because the materials of the criminal case allow to assume that objects important for the said criminal case are located at [the applicant’s home], I order the following: 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111DEC002261393

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1995

11 janvier 1995

    It is also not a technicality if the jury decided that he was not in control of the articles because that is a decision on the facts, because the other part of that limb is that there is

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530DEC006520201

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2006

30 mai 2006

his claim for Bereavement Payment had been refused because his spouse had died before 9 April 2001, the date of the introduction of Bereavement Benefit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105DEC001388504

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2010

5 janvier 2010

She argued that Dr G.G. did not meet all the criteria laid down in the order of 10 July 2002, because he had not had two hundred hours of training in medical management.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC006224200

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2001

18 septembre 2001

The hearing began in February 1996 but was discontinued because the presiding judge was promoted to the Supreme Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0306JUD002422903

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2008

6 mars 2008

    On 23 May 2001 the Tsentralniy District Court refused their application because the enforcement proceedings were still pending and because they had in the meantime advanced by thirty positions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171426

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2017

27 janvier 2017

On 1   July 2011 the Court of Appeal discontinued the criminal case because prosecution had become time-barred.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC003501603

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2007

27 septembre 2007

The latter also explained that he had agreed to publish the article because it had concerned an interesting subject and because the applicant had shown him documents which confirmed the facts described

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1647

Admin. suprême

19 février 2009

19 février 2009

Since certain of these individuals could not be deported because they risked ill-treatment in their country of origin, the Government considered it necessary to create an extended power permitting their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC006835601

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2005

3 novembre 2005

Because the applicant was in Austria at the time, the criminal proceedings continued in his absence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC006190711

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

It had been cancelled on 8 June 2004 for a   different reason, namely because the applicant’s tax liability had been paid in full. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD000345009

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2018

18 décembre 2018

The applicant stated that no separate procedural decisions had been made about his appeal because it had been mislaid by the court. 8 .

Source officielle