THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 8.     The applicants were born in 1949 and 1923 respectively and lived in Bucharest, where the first applicant still lives. 9.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

, either in his appeals against the first-instance decision before the second remittal and against the decision of 22 January 2018 or in the first-instance proceedings after the second remittal, the fact

The fact that the liquidator of the P. company only became aware of those debts in 2015 did not trigger a new three ‑ year limitation period, which had already expired by that time.

which had already been established in a final decision in another civil case involving the same parties or a party in respect of which those facts had been established.

    On 28 September 2017 the applicant requested that the criminal proceedings be reopened on the grounds that her trial had been held in absentia and new facts and evidence had come to light

THE FACTS 4.     The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. 5.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

the facts on which the claim was based contradicted the evidence submitted by the plaintiff herself, or facts which are generally known.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS 1.     The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Baku. He was represented by Mr F. Rahimov, a lawyer practising in Azerbaijan. 2.

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1974 and lived, prior to his arrest and conviction, in Moscow. 5.

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1988 and is currently serving a prison sentence in the Tambov Region. 5.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1967. He was a member of the National Assembly (Milli Majlis), elected in 2005. A.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1938 and is currently in prison. 6.

    It remains to be determined whether the proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court were fair.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)