It held that it was a well ‑ known fact that Yugoslavia no longer existed and that therefore Z.B. could not have the Yugoslav citizenship.

, by eleven votes to six, that there had been no violation of Article 10 of the Convention; - held, by sixteen votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention

The Court accordingly held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1.

    Another public auction was held on 16 April 2002, which was again unsuccessful, as no bids were made. 9.

Subsequently, hearings were held on 15 March, 21 April and 24 May 2006. The applicant did not appear at the hearing of 21 April.

According to the applicant, five prisoners were being held in each of the cells where he was held during his detention.

Winkler, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

with a wet towel, then punched her on the head and on her breast, and Mr Sh. had also punched her on the head. 9.

The case was referred to the Dubrovnik Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Dubrovniku ) as the competent court. 7.

jobs, about the sub-contracting invoiced on behalf of companies T., E. and F. and about the negotiations and sub-contracting jobs for R.

  For that reason those private fishing rights owners who suffer financial losses as a result of the free fishing with hand-held tackle, should be entitled to compensation for such losses in accordance

  For that reason those private fishing rights owners who suffer financial losses as a result of the free fishing with hand-held tackle, should be entitled to compensation for such losses in accordance

   In a judgment of 12 September 1988, the Audiencia Provincial, held that, although the applicant fell into the category provided for in Article 399, the sums embezzled by him were not "public

On 8 June 2010 the Zagreb Municipal Civil Court, while declining jurisdiction in favour of the Zagreb County Court ( Županijski sud u Zagrebu ), held that the decision of the Court of Arbitration of the

the remainder of the applicant’s complaint about his treatment and conditions of detention;   - held that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention;   - held that there had been

Commission on 12 November 1990 and by the Government of Austria on 6 February 1991;        Whereas in its judgment of 25 February 1992 the Court:   -     held

in its judgment of 26 October 1984 the Court unanimously:   - held that the respondent state was to:   1. refrain from recovering, out of the court costs which the Belgian Court of Cassation

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   1 of Protocol No.

The medical practitioners recorded a wound on the applicant’s head and a bruise near the hip bone.