However, neither of these had been carried out during the applicant’s detention which had lasted one year and nine months.

The legal provision complained of had irrevocably prevented the applicants from raising before the administrative courts their complaint that the DVNI had acted outside its powers, and had thus deprived

Nor had they even considered the possibility of recounting the votes once the irregularities had been established.

The applicant pointed out that, unlike himself who had had no criminal record, B. had already had multiple criminal convictions and had been well familiar to the police.

The Court noted that the applicant had been able to raise his arguments before the domestic courts, which had duly examined them and found the disciplinary breach established as the applicant had used

On the critical day, he and his wife had been attacked by four persons while they had been in their car and he had fainted. He had recovered just before the border crossing point.

That was evident from the fact that they had continued hitting him even after he had stopped moving because he had died.

had been at stake.

than those who had been convicted.

In the applicant’s submission, he had indeed been wearing a leather jacket, but it had been for the summer only and had subsequently been taken away from him.

She had also talked to military commander G., who had said that her son had been taken by officers of the FSB.

One applicant alleged that when she had tried to return to her home, rocks had been thrown at her.

Indeed firearms had been found in Mr Kałucki’s car although there had been no evidence that Mr Kałucki or any other suspect had intended to use them.

, had had no other source of income, compared to those who had had additional sources of revenue that had not been stopped or reduced on account of incarceration.

At the time his sentence was handed down he had been living there for thirty-five years and had two children born in France.

that he had refused several times to extinguish his cigarette, that he had reacted strongly when one of the gendarmes had taken the cigarette, that he had refused to lie down on the ground when the situation

Thus, in its judgment, by which the applicant had been convicted for murder, the domestic court had merely stated that it had no doubts regarding the factual circumstances of the case and that it considered

had advance notice of the hearing date.