On 29 February 2012 the Buzet Police Station ( Policijska uprava istarska, Policijska postaja Buzet ) issued a penalty notice, having found the applicant guilty of several minor road traffic offences.

On 23 November 2005 the Zagreb Minor Offences Court ( Prekršajni sud u Zagrebu ) found the applicant guilty on charges of minor offence of family violence for having verbally abused and assaulted his wife

On 27 June 2012 the Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Lviv found I.V. guilty of inflicting minor bodily injuries on the applicant in respect of one episode of 14 January 2010, sentenced him to one hundred

In the criminal proceedings the applicant was found guilty of causing a road traffic accident in which one person had lost her life.

in accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, the sum 5 000 Dutch guilders

It found R. guilty and allowed the civil action against both the applicant and R.

This, the applicant concludes results in a failure to recognise the principle that everyone shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty by law.

On 23 January 2006 a panel presided by judge M.P.R. found the applicant guilty and sentenced him in his absence to two years and eight months’ imprisonment.

accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 5   500 Dutch guilders

Croatia lodged on 14 February 2022 communicated on 26 January 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns minor-offence proceedings against the applicant, a Slovenian national, who was found guilty

On 7 March 2006 Zarinskiy District Court, Altay region, (“the District Court”) acquitted the applicant on charges of theft and found him guilty of robbery.

In particular, the documents in the case-file show that in October 2011 the applicant lodged an appeal against the first ‑ instance judgment of the Delnice Minor Offences Court finding him guilty

Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant, within three months, 6 750 Dutch guilders

avocat au barreau de LILLE DEFENDEUR : Monsieur [W] [R] né le [Date naissance 3] 1976 à [Localité 11][Localité 14] de nationalité Française [Adresse 5] [Localité 6] représenté par Maître Guillaume GUILLUY

constitutional proceedings: non-exhaustion Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Criminal charge Constitutional Court proceedings: Article 6 applicable The Audiencia nacional found the applicant guilty

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des pièces complémentaires, enregistrées les 13 et 14 mai 2024, Mme B A, représentée par Me Guillier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du

On 9   June 2009 the Adana Assize Court with special jurisdiction found the applicant guilty of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation and sentenced him to ten months’ imprisonment

- that it was not necessary to give a separate decision:   a. on her other complaints;   b. on the complaints of Mr X;   - that the respondent State was to pay to Miss Y 3 000 Dutch guilders

:   (Translation)         "Unless a provision of administrative law states otherwise,       negligent behaviour is sufficient to establish guilt

Her findings were relied upon by the trial court when delivering a guilty verdict in the applicant’s case. The appellate court also referred to them, upholding the applicant’s conviction.