AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC002761895
18 janvier 2000
18 janvier 2000
He claimed that he had assisted the second applicant after the killing because he was his friend and because he feared him.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0418JUD000265710
18 avril 2017
18 avril 2017
She complained that she had chosen the form of restitution because she wanted land of equal value to be returned to her in natura .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0530DEC006902701
30 mai 2002
30 mai 2002
On 9 January 1995 the Zagreb Municipal Court issued a warrant of execution, but it was not carried out because S.D. had no means to pay the amount sought. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201485
29 janvier 2020
29 janvier 2020
The meeting was originally scheduled for 10 April 2014 but it was postponed because the applicant was told to wait for the results of genetics tests.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126923
12 septembre 2013
12 septembre 2013
him, because the applicant’s wife had already taken him to the paediatric unit, as instructed by chief-nurse N.L.O.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206DEC006135200
6 février 2003
6 février 2003
On several occasions the applicant asked the court to stay the proceedings because the criminal proceedings against I.S., relevant for the case in question, were still pending.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD003775803
14 novembre 2008
14 novembre 2008
Because the enforcement of the judgment had been delayed, on 27 December 2004 the District Court adjusted the award for the cost of living and awarded the applicant RUB 221,319.22.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118690
20 mars 2013
20 mars 2013
The court concluded that the applicant presented such risks because he was charged with an exceptionally serious crime. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD000555506
18 décembre 2008
18 décembre 2008
The applicants had abused their right of petition because they had misrepresented facts, because their true intention had been to be deported to Canada at the State’s expense, and because they had shown
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC002626419
4 juin 2024
4 juin 2024
More specifically, he submitted that, because of the neighbours’ illegal construction, he and his family could not enjoy the intimacy of their summer home because the neighbours had an open view on it.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601DEC006468401
1 juin 2004
1 juin 2004
The applicants were taken into police custody not because of the fact they had gone on hunger strike, but because of the suspicion that their acts fell within the scope of Article 169.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0912DEC004663699
12 septembre 2000
12 septembre 2000
He also claims that he was denied the right to an effective remedy in respect of the alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention because he was not granted public legal counsel and because
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD005618015
14 décembre 2021
14 décembre 2021
hearing and because it did not hear anew the witnesses and he did not have the possibility to put questions to witnesses. 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD006009212
29 avril 2014
29 avril 2014
He emphasised that in 2004 he had been separated from his children not because of his fault but because of circumstances that were beyond his control – the death of his former wife and the particularly
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0128JUD004332613
28 janvier 2021
28 janvier 2021
By a letter of 15 April 1993 the first applicant and her husband wrote to J.P. asking him to move out because they intended to return to the flat.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0407JUD005407100
7 avril 2005
7 avril 2005
In their decisions the courts persistently held that the applicant's continued detention was lawful and justified because she was charged with a serious criminal offence and because there were no circumstances
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD002057104
30 juillet 2009
30 juillet 2009
because the victims did not attend and one hearing was adjourned because it was necessary to serve a co-defendant with a copy of the indictment bill in a language he understood.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209109
9 mars 2021
9 mars 2021
The Court of Appeal further held that the proceedings, which had been pending before the Regional Court since 2 February 2018, were essential for the applicant because they concerned the amount of his
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503JUD001807915
3 mai 2022
3 mai 2022
The project, which would involve the use of cyanide, was controversial because of its estimated negative impact on the environment and the local heritage.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604JUD004899814
4 juin 2024
4 juin 2024
Varyan because he was slow and naïve. Servicemen called him names, swore at him and took advantage of him because of his naivety, including by making him do the cleaning even if he was not on duty.
Source officiellePage 58 sur 1499