CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC002761895

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2000

18 janvier 2000

He claimed that he had assisted the second applicant after the killing because he was his friend and because he feared him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0418JUD000265710

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2017

18 avril 2017

She complained that she had chosen the form of restitution because she wanted land of equal value to be returned to her in natura .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0530DEC006902701

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2002

30 mai 2002

On 9   January 1995 the Zagreb Municipal Court issued a warrant of execution, but it was not carried out because S.D. had no means to pay the amount sought. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201485

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2020

29 janvier 2020

The meeting was originally scheduled for 10 April 2014 but it was postponed because the applicant was told to wait for the results of genetics tests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126923

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2013

12 septembre 2013

him, because the applicant’s wife had already taken him to the paediatric unit, as instructed by chief-nurse N.L.O.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206DEC006135200

Admin. suprême

6 février 2003

6 février 2003

On several occasions the applicant asked the court to stay the proceedings because the criminal proceedings against I.S., relevant for the case in question, were still pending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD003775803

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2008

14 novembre 2008

    Because the enforcement of the judgment had been delayed, on 27   December 2004 the District Court adjusted the award for the cost of living and awarded the applicant RUB 221,319.22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118690

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2013

20 mars 2013

The court concluded that the applicant presented such risks because he was charged with an exceptionally serious crime. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD000555506

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2008

18 décembre 2008

The applicants had abused their right of petition because they had misrepresented facts, because their true intention had been to be deported to Canada at the State’s expense, and because they had shown

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC002626419

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2024

4 juin 2024

More specifically, he submitted that, because of the neighbours’ illegal construction, he and his family could not enjoy the intimacy of their summer home because the neighbours had an open view on it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601DEC006468401

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2004

1 juin 2004

The applicants were taken into police custody not because of the fact they had gone on hunger strike, but because of the suspicion that their acts fell within the scope of Article 169.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0912DEC004663699

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2000

12 septembre 2000

  He also claims that he was denied the right to an effective remedy in respect of the alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention because he was not granted public legal counsel and because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD005618015

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2021

14 décembre 2021

hearing and because it did not hear anew the witnesses and he did not have the possibility to put questions to witnesses. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD006009212

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2014

29 avril 2014

He emphasised that in 2004 he had been separated from his children not because of his fault but because of circumstances that were beyond his control – the death of his former wife and the particularly

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0128JUD004332613

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2021

28 janvier 2021

    By a letter of 15 April 1993 the first applicant and her husband wrote to J.P. asking him to move out because they intended to return to the flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0407JUD005407100

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2005

7 avril 2005

In their decisions the courts persistently held that the applicant's continued detention was lawful and justified because she was charged with a serious criminal offence and because there were no circumstances

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD002057104

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2009

30 juillet 2009

because the victims did not attend and one hearing was adjourned because it was necessary to serve a co-defendant with a copy of the indictment bill in a language he understood.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209109

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2021

9 mars 2021

The Court of Appeal further held that the proceedings, which had been pending before the Regional Court since 2 February 2018, were essential for the applicant because they concerned the amount of his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503JUD001807915

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

The project, which would involve the use of cyanide, was controversial because of its estimated negative impact on the environment and the local heritage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604JUD004899814

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2024

4 juin 2024

Varyan because he was slow and naïve. Servicemen called him names, swore at him and took advantage of him because of his naivety, including by making him do the cleaning even if he was not on duty.

Source officielle

Page 58 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →