However, they asserted that the examination carried out by the HACU had been aimed at the correction of fundamental judicial errors and based on facts and material of which the parties had already been

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1983 and lives in Bucharest. 6 .

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5 .

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

They argued that the purpose of his application to the Court was not to protect his right to a fair trial, and that his conduct should be regarded as an abuse of the right of individual application. 27

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1947 and lives in Bratislava. A.     Action 6.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

The court stated that it had established the decisive facts concerning the time, place and manner of the commission of the offence on the basis of the statements given by Ms K.K. and the other witnesses

    The Government did not contest the fact that the notice for hearing of 21 June 2006 was belated.

THE FACTS 4.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 5.

Having regard to the fact that the matter concerned a complex assessment of the applicant’s medical condition following cerebral palsy, and noting the limited content of the administrative authorities’

Accordingly, this complaint concerns the fair hearing guarantee, requiring the courts to give sufficient reasons for their decisions (see, for example, García Ruiz v.

THE FACTS 3.     The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.

The appellate court, in turn, concentrated on the fact that the prosecutor’s compliance with the limitation period had already been established in the proceedings against K.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)