CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

24 481 résultats pour « Senut »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131DEC002333507

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2017

31 janvier 2017

Four letters sent to it by the Court between 27 July and 19 December 2016 did not lead to any response.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC005688810

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

She was once again invited to submit any comments and make just satisfaction claims in a letter sent on 7 December 2015. The new time-limit given was 22 January 2016.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144970

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

On 12 February the Bacău Court of Appeal allowed the appeal lodged by the prosecutor, quashed the County Court’s decision and sent the case back to that court to continue the trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1128DEC003408018

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2019

28 novembre 2019

On 21 February 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant asking him to comment on the Government’s letter of 18 January 2019, in which the Government had doubted the authenticity of the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC003660013

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2017

17 octobre 2017

The letter was sent to his home address in Pabianice and was returned to the Court as the addressee had moved out.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609DEC004042304

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2009

9 juin 2009

On 26 March 2008 the Court sent a letter to the applicants informing them that notice of the application had been given to the Government of Bulgaria.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104DEC003292012

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

By letter dated 28 January 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant was again reminded that he had not responded to the Government’s proposal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC005981513

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2016

3 mai 2016

By a letter dated 9 October 2015 sent to the Corradino Correctional Facility, the applicant was reminded to appoint a representative by 6   November 2015.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC005719000

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2003

23 octobre 2003

By letter of the Registry of the Court of 10 October 2002 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209DEC002800602

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2008

9 décembre 2008

THE LAW On 20 August 2008 the Registry of the Court sent the applicant's representative a letter requesting the applicant to submit evidence as to whether he had made a claim in September 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212DEC001556808

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

The letter was sent to the applicant’s home address in Šilutė, which he had indicated as his address for correspondence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0204DEC002476407

Admin. suprême

4 février 2010

4 février 2010

On 27 March and 7 November 2006 and 3 January 2007 the applicant sent letters to the Court in connection with a pending application.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522DEC001045604

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2008

22 mai 2008

THE LAW By letter dated 19 July 2006 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 20

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC001246208

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

On 30 July 2010 the applicant’s representative sent a letter to the Court, expressing a wish to supplement the original application.

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Rouen

DTA_2505630_20260320

Administratif

20 mars 2026

20 mars 2026

d’ordonner une mesure d’expertise, sur le fondement de l’article R. 532-1 du code de justice administrative, portant sur l’origine des inondations survenant sur la parcelle cadastrée AC 277 située 4 sente

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110DEC001551803

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2009

10 novembre 2009

By letter of 12 December 2008, sent by registered post to the applicant’s representative, the Court noted, inter alia , that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516DEC001061921

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2024

16 mai 2024

They were sent to the address of the first applicant, Mr Mikail Çağırıcı. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

4ème sous-section jugeant seule

CETAT:CETATEXT000029288294

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2014

23 juillet 2014

...etA..., les entreprises unipersonnelles à responsabilité limitée l'Originale et Enjoy, et les sociétés Seeseva, Le Boudoir de Zoé, A.C.N., Cuisines et Bains à la Carte, Rêveries, Sowilo, Zorik, Senteur

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305DEC002338907

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2013

5 mars 2013

By another letter dated 2 May 2012, sent by registered post, the applicant was reminded about the necessity to be legally represented at that stage of the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC003801422

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2024

21 novembre 2024

By a letter dated 12 September 2024, sent by registered post as well as via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for

Source officielle

Page 57 sur 1225

← PrécédentSuivant →