CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1214DEC001407488
14 décembre 1989
The application was rejected on 17 February 1986, and a further motion was made on 5 September 1986, allegedly supported by evidence of an inadmissible nature.
Page 57 sur 351
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0115REP002341194
15 janvier 1997
xa0; Requête N° 23411/94 Marc Montion
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9676
23 juin 1993
Conclusion : no need to examine it of the Court's own motion (unanimously). IV. ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION Specified sum awarded in respect of costs and expenses (eight votes to one).
ECLI:CEDH:002-10087
13 juillet 1995
Just satisfaction No claim for compensation or reimbursement of costs and expenses — unnecessary for the Court to consider this matter of its own motion. B.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5299
13 juin 2002
Only a court hearing a case on the merits or another state body could apply to the Constitutional Court, at a plaintiff’s request or of its own motion.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3271
1 juin 2006
argued that this provision did not apply as the inheritance proceedings per se had been non-contentious and the subsequent registration of ownership was to be done by the same local court of its own motion
ECLI:CEDH:002-1007
13 avril 2010
applicant’s life or physical well-being, the ensuing existence of the applicant’s wish to pursue his application could not be the only criterion for putting the protection mechanism of the Convention into motion
ECLI:CEDH:002-10717
22 septembre 2015
In particular, they could seek the amendment and clarification of the pertinent records, bring motions before the investigator and the court, question the undercover agents and police officers, raise objections
ECLI:CEDH:002-10468
8 avril 2015
Law – Article 37 § 1: The granting of a permanent residence permit to the applicant, which effectively repealed the expulsion order, had been taken by the domestic authorities of their own motion.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219228
23 août 2022
The parties are requested to submit copies of the transcripts of all court hearings, the applicant’s motions and requests presented to the Supreme Court and any other relevant document.
J.L.D.
69f279d4cdc6046d4703ea5e
8 avril 2026
Motion de grève du barreau de Strasbourg en date du 1er avril 2026) et les délais du CSP imposant que l’affaire soit retenue malgré l’absence d’un avocat ; M.
JLD
69d040b9cdc6046d47095eb7
3 avril 2026
le contrôle du docteur [L] le 02/04/2026 indiquant que l’audition du patient est impossible par téléphone, En l’absence de l’avocat de permanence régulièrement convoqué, gréviste conformément à la motion
69d040bccdc6046d47095ee8
contrôle du docteur [R] le 03/04/2026 à 00h05 indiquant que l’audition du patient est impossible par téléphone, En l’absence de l’avocat de permanence régulièrement convoqué, gréviste conformément à la motion
69d41b89cdc6046d47562a16
Après avoir recueilli les observations de [O] [A], la personne faisant l’objet de soins psychiatriques, En l’absence de l’avocat de permanence régulièrement convoqué, gréviste conformément à la motion
69d41b9acdc6046d47562b99
6 avril 2026
Loïck MARIE - au directeur du groupe hospitalier du [Localité 2] - au procureur de la République du HAVRE ; En l’absence de l’avocat de permanence régulièrement convoqué, gréviste conformément à la motion
ECLI:CEDH:001-221878
22 novembre 2022
His appeal and motion for leave to appeal on points of law, as well as his constitutional complaint, were dismissed.
ECLI:CEDH:001-171229
19 janvier 2017
The Budapest Prison of its own motion initiated criminal proceedings on charges of forced interrogation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-244224
20 juin 2025
decision no. 620/2019 of the Court of Cassation was delivered on 28 March 2019 and finalised on 19 February 2020, but it did not appear as available until the applicant received a copy on his own motion
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1124DEC005579912
24 novembre 2022
Protocol No. 1 concerning the delayed enforcement of a domestic decision were communicated to the Albanian Government (“the Government”), the friendly ‑ settlement procedure being set in motion
ECLI:CEDH:001-249947
31 mars 2026
In particular, having regard to the procedural protection from torture or inhuman treatment, were the domestic authorities under an obligation to initiate an investigation of their own motion, either after