An official at the Labour Office, X, had allegedly told him that he could receive unemployment benefits, provided he owned less than 51 per cent of the company's shares.

On 24 April 2000 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dismissed a complaint lodged by a number of individuals against the Instruction of the Ministry of Labour and Social Development of 29  

  The IFL took legal action against Siglfirðingur ehf before the Icelandic Labour Court.

limitée des Trilles, l'exploitation agricole à responsabilité limitée Chausson, l'exploitation agricole à responsabilité limitée de La Capelle, l'exploitation agricole à responsabilité limitée Bonneau Laborde

    On 23 July 1998 the Ljubljana Higher Labour and Social Court rejected the applicant’s appeal.

    The Labour Code 1986 (a)     Prohibition against discrimination in employment 14 .

    The applicant instituted proceedings before the Budapest Labour Court challenging his dismissal. 14 .

le fondement des dispositions de l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative, d'enjoindre aux occupants sans droit ni titre de libérer sans délai l'aire d'accueil de la Jallère, 24 avenue Labarde

The Labour Code allowed solely the parties to an agreement to request its annulment or seek its performance. B.

constatée par la Cour dans cette affaire concerne l’impossibilité pour un syndicat indépendant d’exclure un de ses membres, en vertu de l’article 174 de la loi de 1992 sur les syndicats ( Trade Union and Labour

The dismissed employees applied to the labour courts, alleging unfair dismissal, and seeking reinstatement in their original posts. These courts found in their favour.

On 14 June 2005 the president of the Pest County Labour Court ordered the priority treatment of the case. 7.

Although subsequently the Constitutional Court’s decision had opened the way for bringing individual labour actions, their right of access to court was made obsolete by Act no.

    First set of proceedings On 27 March 2000 the applicant instituted a labour dispute before the Ljubljana Labour and Social Court against his former employer seeking the payment of benefits

At the relevant time the applicant held the position of Deputy Chief Labour Inspector of Ternopil Region.

signed by the Government on Friendly settlement declaration signed by the applicant(s) on Friendly settlement sum (in euros)     22642/09 22/04/2009 Zoran MITIK 12/03/1960 Skopje     Labour

    The applicant initiated a labour lawsuit against his employer on 1 July 2005 for unpaid remunerations.

In his decision the director reasoned that by giving the interview of 22 April 2010, the applicant had breached Article   221(2) of the Labour Code and paragraph 2.1.11 of his employment contract.

discrimination is provided for by the Constitution (Articles 6 and 38) and in particular by the Protection Against Discrimination Act of 2003, which, in the context of the exercise of the right to labour