On appeal, the Pest County Regional Court held hearings on 20   February and 9 October 1997.

On 18 September 2001 an oral hearing was held, following which the case was declared admissible.

    The applicant credit union provided a detailed account of the assets it allegedly held when the receivership had been imposed.

In sum, the Court considers it appropriate to allow the applicant's claims in respect of pecuniary damage in full and awards her EUR 1,448, plus any tax that may be chargeable, under this head. 26.

, by eleven votes to six, that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention; - held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 10 of the Convention; - held, by nine votes to

  The gardeners paid the required sum for the land to the Slovak Land Fund. The applicant community of land owners received 1.4097 hectares of different land in compensation on 1 October 2002.

The applicant wanted to get professional help for S. 9.     During the summer of 2005 the applicant had frequent contact with the social services.

Another hearing was held on 31 March 1999. 9.

    As regards the criminal head of Article 6, the Government referred to the judgment in the case of Reinprecht (cited above), in which the Court held that “applying Article 6 to the proceedings

As the applicant had not requested any sum under Article 41 (just satisfaction) for pecuniary damage, the Court made no award under that head. (The judgment is available only in French.)

This sum (EUR 3,327.09) shall cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses.

Winkler, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

In the first round of the election, held on 31 October 2004, the applicant received 0.03% votes and did not proceed to the second round. B.

    The Government did not submit any specific observations under this head. 20.

At the hearing held on 9 February 2001 the court heard those witnesses. 10.

It thus claimed the sum it had had to pay to F.M. and H.H., namely 26,388.46   euros (EUR), under this head. 56.

  The Court held a hearing in the case.

During that time it held twenty-four hearings and heard abundant evidence.