In accordance with the applicable rules, the jury's finding of no guilt was final.

without his having previously been proved guilty according to law (see, mutatis mutandis , the Lutz, Englert and Nölkenbockhoff v.

The court   relied on the strong probability of the applicant’s guilt, the gravity of charges against him and the high risk of his hindering the proper conduct of the proceedings.

The applicant pleaded not guilty. His defence followed by and large the same lines as N.M.’s.

On 3 May 2001, the Court of Appeal acquitted the applicant of all charges, holding that the first-instance court had erred in its interpretation of the evidence as to the applicant’s guilt.

On the same day the applicant was questioned and acknowledged his guilt. 18.

according to law whereas the conclusions of the Bureau and subsequent decisions of the administrative body were not intended to establish anyone’s guilt of a criminal offence. 24.

commerce et des sociétés de MARSEILLE, ayant son siège [Adresse 4] agissant poursuite et diligences de ses représentants légaux domiciliés audit siège [Adresse 4] [Localité 1] Représentée par Me Céline GUILLE

: Vu les articles 1239 et 1984 du Code civil ; Attendu, selon l'arrêt déféré, que, dans le cadre d'un accord dénommé "Fiche d'accord de circuit direct - année 1990", les sociétés Scareder et Guille

Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Disciplinary penalty imposed on doctor for criticising fellow practitioner in report to a patient: violation   Facts : The applicant, a consultant, was found guilty

Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant, within three months, 6 750 Dutch guilders

Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay the applicant, within three months, 7 200 Dutch guilders

case before the Grand Chamber;   Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of the Netherlands would pay the applicant, the sum of 1 000 Netherlands guilders

proceedings under national law: Court attaches weight to the finding of the Federal Court, in its judgment in the present case, that the fine in question is “penal” in character and depends on the “guilt

On 31 May 2007 the applicant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to ten months’ imprisonment, suspended for three years, but this judgment was quashed on appeal on 29 January 2008.

    Minor-Offences proceedings On 4 June 2007 the Labin Minor-Offences Court found the applicant guilty of physically attacking a football judge, one I.R., during a football match in Viškovići

On 18   August 2009 the Erzurum Assize Court with special jurisdiction found the applicant guilty of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation and sentenced him to four terms

He had not pleaded guilty and he had been part of a criminal enterprise. The applicant filed an appeal.

  6 of Pervouralsk found the applicant guilty of having made a death threat to A. and having caused bodily injuries to A. The court gave the applicant a 2.5   years’ suspended sentence.