Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
civ3
61372366cd5801467740945c
1 février 2000
1 février 2000
épouse X..., demeurant ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 22 janvier 1998 par la cour d'appel de Versailles (12e et 13e chambres commerciales réunies), au profit : 1 / de la société Maubrey Finet
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-154285
8 avril 2015
8 avril 2015
The court fined the applicant 5,000 Russian roubles and issued an expulsion order against him. The applicant was required to leave Russia at his own expense. The applicant lodged an appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172194
24 février 2017
24 février 2017
He was fined EUR 2,400.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0711DEC001631590
11 juillet 1991
11 juillet 1991
The fine was reduced to DM 15,000, and the possibility of imprisonment as ultimate sanction was lifted.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629DEC004944615
29 juin 2021
29 juin 2021
fine imposed on the applicant by the District Court had been considerable.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212655
30 septembre 2021
30 septembre 2021
The applicants were subsequently fined under Article 20.2 § 5 of the Code of Administrative Offences on the ground that they had failed to comply with the prior notification requirement provided by the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC000689204
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
He was found guilty and fined GBP 400 with GBP 100 costs. His licence was endorsed with three penalty points.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD001826803
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
Under section 49(2), such a minor offence is punishable with a maximum fine of SKK 3,000. 21.
Source officiellecr
ée de ses demandes après annulation de la procédure suiviec/Yves X
613725fbcd5801467742206e
29 novembre 2000
29 novembre 2000
procès-verbal à septembre 1989 et la comparution devant le tribunal à janvier 1991 ; qu'il est manifeste que le non-respect de ce délai raisonnable doit entraîner la nullité de la procédure " (arrêt, p. 27 in fine
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1124DEC003864497
24 novembre 1998
24 novembre 1998
The Court has had regard to the purpose of the fine.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1485
23 juin 2009
23 juin 2009
In the ensuing criminal proceedings for insult and defamation brought by the historian, the applicant was found guilty and fined.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200159
5 décembre 2019
5 décembre 2019
Communicated on 5 December 2019 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 17412/16 Vasile Sorin MARIN against Romania lodged on 23 March 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant in the present case was fined
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223323
2 février 2023
2 février 2023
In October 2014 the applicant was fined approximately 600 Euros by the Customs Office of the Henri Coandă International Airport of Bucharest for having committed the minor offence ( contravenție ) of not
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228795
13 octobre 2023
13 octobre 2023
By a decision of 4 July 2019 the Veles Court of First Instance found the applicant guilty of not having a permit ( испратница ) for the transport of lumber and therefore fined him 2,000 euros and ordered
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250090
16 avril 2026
16 avril 2026
The applicant was fined 2,000 euros (EUR), for a minor road traffic offence by Družba za avtoceste v Republiki Sloveniji (DARS), a company operating and maintaining the national motorway and expressway
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4675
14 décembre 2003
14 décembre 2003
The mother was granted custody in the divorce proceedings and continued not complying with the access regulations, for which she was twice fined by the Welfare Office.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104DEC004082721
4 novembre 2025
4 novembre 2025
In addition, the imposition of such fine was not mandatory, since domestic law allowed for judicial discretion in that connection.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0517JUD003976420
17 mai 2022
17 mai 2022
The applicant paid the fine in 2018. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT 2. The applicant complained under Article 10 of the Convention because he had been fined for contempt of court. 3.
Source officielleRéférés civils
69de8c6acdc6046d473c9822
14 avril 2026
14 avril 2026
NATURE, Société [N] exerçant sous l’enseigne commerciale [N] ATLAS IN FINE, SOCIETE MUTUELLE D’ASSURANCE DU BATIMENT ET DES TRAVAUX PUBLICS (SMABTP), S.A.R.L.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0527DEC002936595
27 mai 2003
27 mai 2003
The applicant was sentenced to 6 months’ imprisonment and fined 100,000,000 TRL.
Source officiellePage 57 sur 2501