CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD007046817
18 février 2020
The applicant was taken into custody following his conviction at first instance and his application to see his wife and children was rejected.
Page 56 sur 606
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC003404402
29 avril 2008
He did, however, renew his offer to grant the applicant and his wife a right of temporary occupancy subject to conditions.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003513797
1 juillet 1998
On 23 May 1989, a son was born to the applicant and his wife.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD001638105
27 avril 2010
Both the applicant and his wife had been drinking. The applicant's wife wanted him to be taken by the police to a sobering-up centre. 7.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123JUD001220518
23 novembre 2023
Family members whom the applicant was not allowed to see: wife and son.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2646760-2892598
26 février 2009
discrimination) Violation of Article 38 § 1 (a) (refusal to submit documents requested by the Court) The Court awarded 12,000 euros (EUR), jointly, to Aslanbek Astamirov’s mother, wife
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC002622695
17 mai 1995
In early 1993 the relationship broke down and H.K. returned to his wife.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2034188-2149673
7 juin 2007
The applicant claimed that he had been beaten by the prison wardens on several occasions, that parcels sent by his wife had been confiscated and that he had not received appropriate health care (he suffered
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0307DEC004458598
7 mars 2000
Particular circumstances of the case The applicant and his wife were married in 1987 and had two children, born in 1988 and 1990. The applicant’s wife died in 1998, aged 37 years.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003694097
29 janvier 2002
The applicant and his wife were married in 1973 and had three children, born in 1974, 1976 and 1988. The applicant’s wife died in 1996. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002567694
28 février 1996
In October 1993 the applicant and his now ex-wife decided to separate.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701DEC002000907
1 juillet 2014
On 4 December 2000 the Levoberezhniy District Court of Voronezh took a decision in favour of the applicant and his wife (Mrs Galina Yurievna Yuryeva).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1007DEC003434410
7 octobre 2014
On 19 September 1999 the applicant’s wife died at the Galați County Hospital during a child birth operation. 4.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1766
9 décembre 2008
The applicant's wife, who visited him twice a month, submitted that his health constantly deteriorated during his detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207DEC001010810
7 février 2012
He maintains in particular that instead of his parents, his wife should have been informed of his arrest.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0605DEC000249814
5 juin 2025
On 3 August 2015 the applicant’s wife informed the Court of the death of the applicant and of her intention to pursue the application. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT 9.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2353863-2533937
13 mai 2008
Mr McCann and his ex-wife were secure tenants, under the provisions of the Housing Act 1985, of a three-bedroom house belonging to Birmingham City Council.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0212JUD000239317
12 février 2026
In March 2016 the applicant, his wife and their son obtained Romanian passports.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC002030892
2 décembre 1992
It follows from the applicant's statements and the documents submitted that on 28 July 1989 the applicant's wife instituted divorce proceedings against him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC003625897
21 janvier 2003
On the same day, the applicant’s wife was charged with a similar offence and detained on remand.