in relation to a period when the property in question was still owned by the Bratislava Evangelical Church (for a summary of the applicable principles, see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

    The criminal proceedings into the unlawful killing by gunfire of Mr   Velicu-Valentin Mocanu are still pending.

He made a written submission to the head of SIZO-1 to the effect that those injuries had been inflicted by police officers during his arrest in Perm. 36 .

The full text of the article reads as follows: “Europe has always made mankind think of it not just as a geographical space, but in terms of a moral-ethical habitat.

In the light of the progress he had made, it had not been considered necessary to request the competent District Court to prolong the measure. 46.

  In particular, did the alleged interference in the present case fall within the State’s margin of appreciation in the organisation of its armed forces, to which reference is expressly made in Article

He made a statement similar to that of Kh. concerning the events that had taken place before the latter had been wounded.

    On 23 January 2018 another attempt was made by the bailiffs to hand the second applicant over to the first applicant, without success.

The made no specific submission in respect of S. 58.

    On 6 November 2008 the District Court allowed Ms A.’s claim in part, ordered a retraction of the impugned statements and made an award in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 16.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

It thus considers that there is no need to pursue the examination of the applicant’s remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.   Romania [GC], no.

    While the applicants submitted that they had received the amount due under the final judgment of 13 March 2015, they did not mention the date on which that payment had been made.

In 1984 she became the owner of a plot of land which was included in a series of development plans and repeatedly made subject to construction prohibitions with a view to its expropriation.

Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 20 March 2018 by a Moldovan national, Mr Valentin

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his or her heirs or close relatives may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

The applicants further complain under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the reversal of the compensations awards made by the Town Court, which had already been paid to the applicants, violated their right