CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 985 951 résultats pour « Preynet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-69846

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2005

7 juin 2005

               Improvement of procedural safeguards in order to prevent torture or ill-treatment in police custody   3.

Source officielle

Page 56 sur 99298

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-69919

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

Contracting Parties to abide by the Court's judgments in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention implies, inter alia , an obligation to take general measures without delay in order to prevent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68001

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2004

22 décembre 2004

Article 25 of the Convention by Mr   Dimiter   Pobornikoff, a German national, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaint that in criminal proceedings against him, he was not present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56378

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2004

20 juillet 2004

the case by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent state gave the Committee information about the measures taken preventing new violations of the same kind as that found in the present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56382

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2004

20 juillet 2004

An anonymous witness may thus be questioned at a non-public hearing after appropriate acoustic and visual obstacles have been created to prevent the parties from establishing the identity of the secret

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-69985

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2005

18 juillet 2005

Ministers;   Considering accordingly that the execution of the payment undertakings contained in the friendly settlement has become without object and that no other measure was required in the present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56105

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2002

22 juillet 2002

Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56311

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

the case by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent state gave the Committee information about the measures taken preventing new violations of the same kind as that found in the present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55839

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2000

10 avril 2000

Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55712

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1999

9 juin 1999

Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50287

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 1999

15 juillet 1999

Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50374

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1999

8 octobre 1999

Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55729

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1999

8 octobre 1999

examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the respondent State gave the Committee information about the measures taken preventing new violations similar to that found in the present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51405

Admin. suprême

25 juin 1996

25 juin 1996

regard to Italy's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55636

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1995

19 octobre 1995

       In view of these developments the Government of the Netherlands considers that there is no risk of any repetition of the violation found by the European Court in the present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55649

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 1995

15 décembre 1995

regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;        Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55664

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 1995

15 décembre 1995

the Court unanimously:        - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        - held that the present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51082

Admin. suprême

19 février 1999

19 février 1999

Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55704

Admin. suprême

19 février 1999

19 février 1999

the Convention and that it was unnecessary to determine whether there had been a breach of paragraph   1 in conjunction with paragraph   3 e, of Article 6 of the Convention; - held that the present

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50673

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 1997

11 juillet 1997

regard to Italy’s obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide by them;   Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent

Source officielle