that there had been no violation of Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention;   -   held that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 4, of the Convention;   -   held that

The journalists alleged that in the summer 2002 W.D., the Head of the Private Office of the Minister of Health ( Szef Gabinetu Politycznego Ministra Zdrowia ) [1] had demanded a bribe from representatives

    On 14 September 2004 the Krasnodar Regional Court held an appeal hearing. It endorsed the reasoning of the first-instance court. D.

, by seventeen votes to two, that Article 10 of the Convention was applicable in the present case;   – held, by ten votes to nine, that there had been a violation of Article 10;   – held, unanimously

The Palermo court responsible for the execution of sentences held a hearing on 11 March 1997.

After having held preliminary hearings on 8   January   2003, the court held an oral hearing comprising ten sessions between 7 and 22 May 2003.

On 19 October 1981 the Government decreed a series of temporary measures designed to help victims with pensions, unemployment, funeral expenses, medical care, rehabilitation and help in the home.

    On 19 and 30 September, and 2 and 3 October 1997 the court held further hearings.

As regards long-term visits, the court held that the applicant had not been entitled to them, in accordance with domestic law.

On 3 June 1997 the court held a hearing.

Saliyev, Head of the Advisory Board of the NGO Investory Kolymy” 8.

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6   §   1.

(art. 6-3-b, art. 17, art. 18);   -     held that the respondent state was to pay the applicant compensation for damage to the sum of 100 000 French francs;   -   &#

on 17 September 1992, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32- 1), of

    On 19 February 2008 a presidential election was held in Armenia.

It held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1.

He also submitted that he had been held in cells with smokers. Moreover, he raised the problems of humidity, lack of hygiene and warm water and limited access to make telephone calls. 8.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 1,500,000 Greek drachmas (GRD) for non-pecuniary damage.

    The first hearing was held on 15 June 1994.