N. had lived in that house and had told Ru. that he had been the victim of fraud. 25.

Such a move had been foreseeable and had been made on clear and compelling public-interest grounds.

The fact that the applicant had found new employment following his dismissal was not sufficient to eliminate the damaging effects that the impugned events had had on his ability to lead a normal personal

The autopsy examination had been perfunctory and thus important questions had been left unresolved.

had been sufficiently convincing.

There had been no indication that they had resisted or used force against the officers.

that such documents had never been issued, but not that they had been lost.

had had only a limited margin of appreciation to interfere with them.

They further submitted that their correspondence with the Court had been interfered with, in that their mail had been opened and there had been delays in delivering it.

The officers had not taken any steps to de-escalate the tension between the two groups. They had stepped in belatedly, only when a real risk of inflicting bodily injuries had appeared.

  R., had not definitely confirmed that her husband had died of a heart attack, given that no autopsy had been carried out.

Although he had not resisted in any way, they had hit him in the face and his lip had started bleeding.

He had told her that Sh.A. and two bodyguards had been killed and that A.O. had been wounded and had had a car accident.

C.Z. had also stated before the court that he had not seen the victim’s car before it had fallen into the river, that he had heard a thump and had not seen anything else, and that the distance between

The interference had been prescribed by law and its aim had been the protection of the reputation or rights of others.

It was not in dispute, however, that the two men had been taken on 12 May 2001 to the Staropromyslovskiy VOVD, where they had spent the night and that they had not been seen since.

Abandoned the same day along a country road, he testified that, although he and Musa had had sacks pulled over their heads, he had at one point recognised that they had been taken to Urus-Martan military

    The Court noted, further, that only one of the witnesses questioned had stated that verbal warnings had been given, while another had indicated that no warning had been given and a third

Inadmissible : The applicant had complained that he had not had a fair trial, in particular since he had not been given the opportunity to question K.