Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 23 November 1993.

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 22 000 French francs for legal fees;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of France to inform it of the

franc in respect of non-pecuniary damage and the sum of 32 400 French francs in respect of legal fees;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of France

case originated in an application (No. 31801/96) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 10 January 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Alain Maini, a French

case originated in an application (No. 31801/96) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 10 January 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Alain Maini, a French

to examine the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention; - held that the respondent State was to pay the applicant, within three months from the date at which the judgment become final, 30 000 French

originated in an application (No. 43288/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 13 may 1998 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr   Daniel   Mahieu, a French

in an application (No. 39273/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 30 May 1997 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr   Omer   Vermeersch, a French

lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 26 February 1993 under Article   25 of the Convention by Mr   Mario   Mantovanelli and Ms   Andrée   Mantovanelli, two French

By fax of 17 April 2014 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant’s fresh request for asylum had been granted and that he therefore wished to withdraw the application.

in an application (No. 36754/97) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 25 June 1997 under Article 25 of the unamended Convention by Mr Antoine François Donsimoni, a French

case originated in an application (No. 32675/96) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 24 June 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Mponga Ikanga, a French

On 12 December 2013 the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal quashed that decision and remitted the case for a fresh examination to the first instance court.

originated in an application (No. 31430/96) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 20 February 1996 under Article 25 of the unamended Convention by Mr Jean Seidel, a French

preliminary objections; - held that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention; - held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant, within three months, 5 000 French

that the case originated in an application against France lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 16 September 1987 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Roland Birou, a French

against France, in which the Committee of Ministers decided that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of a breach of his right to respect for family life because of the French

Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant within three months the sum of 80 000 French