CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-24

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

  3 resulting from inadequate conditions of detention in some Russian remand centres was an issue of considerable magnitude and complexity that stemmed from a large number of negative factors, both

Source officielle

Page 56 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140701

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2014

8 janvier 2014

Only families with both spouses younger than thirty six were eligible.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9593

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2014

16 juillet 2014

Both the applicant and her spouse wished to remain married as a divorce would be against their religious convictions and they considered that a civil partnership did not provide the same security as marriage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11973

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2018

31 mai 2018

Both applicants are currently being held at the US Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay. Mr   Husayn, also known as Abu Zubaydah, has never been charged with any offence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192865

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2019

5 avril 2019

    Was the length of the first applicant’s pre-trial detention in both sets of criminal proceedings initiated against him in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 5 § 3 of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11206

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2016

1 septembre 2016

The Court noted that there was a strong indication that drug substitution treatment could be regarded as the required medical treatment for the applicant: this was confirmed both by the doctors who had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161267

Admin. suprême

9 février 2016

9 février 2016

The court held that both drivers were liable for the accident. The court also noted that both drivers were insured.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11721

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2017

3 octobre 2017

The proceedings eventually ended in November 2012 following an appeal on points of law by both parties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0313DEC003344021

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2025

13 mars 2025

In both applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111808

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2012

4 juin 2012

16 September 1997 P.V. and his wife   brought a private criminal action ( privatna krivična tužba ) against the applicant   for insult and defamation ( uvreda i kleveta ) and against   both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118229

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2013

8 mars 2013

The findings in that report included several scars caused by cigarette burns on both arms, scar tissue on the right leg caused by trauma, a 2,5 cm long scar on the left buttock and several other scars

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10999

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2016

21 avril 2016

Law – Article 8: Although only the first applicant had legal rights to the house, both applicants had lived in the property for a number of years. It was therefore “home” for both of them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146651

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2014

5 septembre 2014

Both the parties or their representatives shall be present during the hearing. The decision may be rendered in the parties’ absence if they are not present without legitimate reason.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242119

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2025

27 janvier 2025

For its part, Renfe was found liable for both violations and fined EUR 49.962.000 and EUR 15.129.000 EUR for each breach. Both the applicants and Renfe challenged separately this decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11974

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2018

31 mai 2018

Both applicants are currently being held at the US Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay. Mr Abu Zubaydah   has never been charged with any offence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC004112014

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

Both the prosecutor of the Volgograd region and the representative of the Ministry of Finance were parties to the case. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230028

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2023

11 décembre 2023

Both parents’ consent was needed for signing the contract with the school, at the beginning of each new school year.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105DEC004353816

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2020

5 novembre 2020

He and his representative both presented their arguments to the appeal court, having mainly referred to the appeal complaint and other written submissions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3332

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2006

9 mai 2006

Both the applicant and L. applied for their custody. The District court, and later the Court of Appeal, both granted custody to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141019

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2013

20 novembre 2013

Therefore, there has been an obvious mistake ( lapsus calami ) both in §§ 32-35 of the judgment, as well as in the operative provisions.

Source officielle