Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2535864-2757537
6 novembre 2008
6 novembre 2008
been hardly likely to provoke others to violence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC000179803
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
According to a report drawn up by the police on the same day, the applicant had been responsible for the accident.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2988436-3292864
14 janvier 2010
14 janvier 2010
The lower courts granted his claim, but the Supreme Court rejected it in May 2003, holding that the employer had been entitled to assess the need for reassignment and that, in their reasoning, it had been
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117DEC004172905
17 janvier 2008
17 janvier 2008
paid to the applicants had not been properly accounted for.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2906504-3193826
22 octobre 2009
22 octobre 2009
There had been no evidence before the courts of a risk that the applicant would reoffend if released.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2185274-2334823
22 novembre 2007
22 novembre 2007
It remained to be determined whether the interference had been “necessary in a democratic society”.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318DEC000499004
18 mars 2008
18 mars 2008
time had been violated and that they had been awarded a sum of CZK 144,000 (EUR 5,602) in respect of non-pecuniary damage they might have sustained.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2482838-2689328
18 septembre 2008
18 septembre 2008
a matter of controversy – fuelled and revived by the imam’s departure – that had been widely reported in the regional and national press.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC001638408
22 octobre 2013
22 octobre 2013
The Presidium found that, in breach of procedural law, the applicant’s right to legal assistance had been infringed, and that the appeal lodged by his statutory representative (father) had not been examined
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0311DEC003544603
11 mars 2008
11 mars 2008
The Court also specified that the applicants whose claims for damages had not been granted by the Ministry of Justice or had been only partly granted, had to file a civil action against the State before
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68171-68639
7 juin 2001
7 juin 2001
The prosecution authorities considered that her injuries had been caused by “her aggressive behaviour and the policemen's attempts to deal with it”.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68058-68526
9 décembre 1999
9 décembre 1999
However, when he went there, the applicant discovered that no office had been allocated to him.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC001624302
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
The applicant, who had not been legally represented, appealed in cassation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0902DEC000088007
2 septembre 2008
2 septembre 2008
On 4 January 1985, being convinced that her physical and mental suffering was caused by polluted water supplied by the water board, and having been granted free legal aid, the applicant instituted civil
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0420JUD001505602
20 avril 2006
20 avril 2006
the agreement had been concluded. 16.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1118DEC002267411
18 novembre 2014
18 novembre 2014
The court found that, even though some of the flats in so-called “road-workers’ houses” had indeed been sold under the Protected Tenancies (Sale to Occupier) Act, the majority had not been sold.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0320JUD001268603
20 mars 2009
20 mars 2009
The Chamber found in the present case that the length of the proceedings had been excessive and that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1. 45.
Source officielle2ème Chambre
DTA_2112932_20250107
7 janvier 2025
7 janvier 2025
Les sociétés défenderesses doivent donc être condamnées in solidum à verser cette somme à la commune de La Bernerie-en-Retz. 11.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3010510-3319894
28 janvier 2010
28 janvier 2010
procedural and substantive rules had been complied with.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2999362-3306816
20 janvier 2010
20 janvier 2010
unfair, in particular because he has not been provided with adequate legal assistance at the hearing before the court of appeal and has been unable to conduct his defence effectively as he could only
Source officiellePage 56 sur 4750