CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 493 résultats pour « Alexandre BECAUD »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001665490

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

Page 56 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD002758116

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2022

9 juin 2022

    The Government raised a preliminary objection concerning loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because they were afforded adequate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303JUD001978803

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2020

3 mars 2020

    The Government requested revision of the judgment of 26   February   2019, which they had been unable to execute because Mr   Petru   Nicolae   Albu had died before

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209JUD006105011

Admin. suprême

9 février 2016

9 février 2016

) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Moldovan national, Mr Alexandru

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD003708703

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2020

17 novembre 2020

    The applicant argued that the above-mentioned court judgment had not changed the circumstances of her case because the authorities had still neither returned her property to her nor had they

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1025REP003509597

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 1999

25 octobre 1999

xa0;   EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS                               Application No. 35095/97     Peter Alexander

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0319JUD002041692

Admin. suprême

19 mars 1997

19 mars 1997

       The applicants, or in some cases their spouses, were born between 1902 and 1938 and worked as private-sector employees in Istanbul, Alexandria or Cairo between 1927

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327JUD000872105

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

27 mars 2007

    The applicants, Mr Viorel Istratii, Mr Alexandru Burcovschi and Mr   Roman Luţcan, are Moldovan nationals who were born in 1971, 1970 and 1976 respectively and all live in Chişinău.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624JUD000498624

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2025

24 juin 2025

    In the case of Alexandru Marian Iancu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0115DEC007634117

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2019

15 janvier 2019

    On 29 March 2016 the applicant hijacked an Egypt Air internal flight (flight no.181) from Alexandria to Cairo forcing it to divert to Larnaca international airport in Cyprus.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-794011-811071

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2003

15 juillet 2003

After merging with another company, it renamed itself Fortum Oil and Gas Oy and eventually became the Fortum Corporation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD007301113

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2017

12 janvier 2017

Greece, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Ledi Bianku, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Aleš Pejchal, judges, and Renata

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD001452105

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2015

12 novembre 2015

In the remaining part the judgment of 30   March   2004 was upheld and became final and enforceable. 14 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD000568206

Admin. suprême

5 février 2015

5 février 2015

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD000193705

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2014

16 octobre 2014

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623DEC006531313

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2020

23 juin 2020

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 23 June 2020 as a Chamber composed of:   Ksenija Turković, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC000146706

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

The decision became final on 22 March 2004 and was enforced on 29 November 2007.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD001616290

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

In the case of Alexandrou v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617JUD001461519

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2021

17 juin 2021

    The applicants submitted that constitutional redress proceedings were not an effective remedy because the Constitutional Court systematically failed to afford a remedy which was sufficient

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD004675599

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

    However, this planning procedure was not completed because, due to the 1974 Turkish intervention, the applicant and her family had been forced to leave all their property and possessions

Source officielle