THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Chişinău. 6.

In such a case, the Court cannot but conclude that the civil proceedings in the present case fell short of the requirement of a fair hearing. 21.

    In determining whether the proceedings as a whole were fair, regard must be had to whether the rights of the defence were respected.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

The facts part of the judgment also mentioned a letter from the public notary stating that they had no record of such a POA being made.

Demaria, a lawyer practising in Split; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the right to a fair hearing and the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions to the Croatian Government

THE FACTS 1.     The applicant was born in 1985 and is currently serving an imprisonment sentence in Stara Zagora Prison. He was represented before the Court by Ms P.

    The general principles concerning the right to a fair trial have been summarised in Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan (no. 2) (no. 32734/11, §§   76-83, 7   April 2022). 23.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

    The applicant alleged that he had been denied a fair trial on account of the domestic courts’ failure to examine his claim, in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 4.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicant alleged that she had not had a fair trial in that she had been convicted on the basis of   evidence which she had given under duress during the preliminary investigation

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicants were cadets in military schools.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     At the material time all the applicants were detained in Russian penal facilities. 5.