CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD006760410
6 novembre 2012
Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see Lukanov v. Bulgaria , judgment of 20 March 1997, Reports 1997 ‑ II, § 41; Assanidze v.
Page 55 sur 763
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0220JUD000134612
20 février 2014
It again referred to the applicant’s role in the commission of the offences alleged and considered that, if at liberty, he might tamper with evidence and influence the other accused and witnesses.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD003891107
11 octobre 2016
He relied on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention which provides: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1103JUD002848406
3 novembre 2016
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD004429209
22 novembre 2016
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD004373309
9 janvier 2014
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD005013108
16 septembre 2014
The applicant’s alleged deprivation of liberty and her subsequent placement in a psychiatric institution 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD007334114
16 janvier 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0604JUD005215813
4 juin 2020
the domestic courts had failed to address his specific arguments in support of his release in breach of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “...Everyone who is deprived of his liberty
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11133
2 juin 2016
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-e - Persons of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD000334211
6 octobre 2016
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD006530216
28 juin 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD004371709
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203JUD006258112
3 février 2015
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review;Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD004595711
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Brought promptly before judge or other officer);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD004391808
22 mai 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0317JUD000667010
17 mars 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0905JUD001826123
5 septembre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0425JUD005747022
25 avril 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD005065809