The Court notes at the outset that the applicant did not request an oral hearing before the domestic courts. Neither did the courts hold such a hearing of their own motion.

    The applicant did not appear either at the hearing on 24 January 2008, but instead again submitted a written statement that he did not wish to participate in the hearing on account of his

  Hearings before Land Reform Boards   22.

fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light) from 03/07/2020 to 04/08/2020;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings

When the summary procedure is adopted, the hearing takes place in private and is devoted to hearing the arguments of the parties.

The hearing was fixed for 7 October 1997. Then the Judge before whom the hearing was conducted was promoted to the Supreme Court and had to abandon the examination of the case.

He requested an adjournment of the hearing, but the IAP refused. 13.

On 15 March 2002 it ordered that the hearing take place on 14 May 2002.

any other hearing held in the context of his case. 13.

  An oral hearing shall take place at the request of an individual party to the case, if such a hearing is not unnecessary and there are no particular reasons against it.

    Appeal hearing of 5 May 2011 The new appeal hearing was set for 16 December 2010.

The respondent’s representative attended the adjournment hearing and countersigned the trial record specifying that the appeal hearing was listed for 13 July 2004.

The appeal hearing was scheduled for 21 April 2005. 10.

boats or other machines, or for any purpose other than heating...” 7.

One substitute professional judge and two substitute lay judges also attended the hearings.

back to the District Court for a re-hearing.

the appeal hearing.

relevant and sufficient reasons to justify their initial and/or continued pre-trial detention; - The length of their pre-trial detention was excessive; - The reviews of detention took place without a hearing

Neither party appeared at a preliminary hearing on 11 August 1998 and the appeal was re-listed for hearing.