The applicant’s father had stabbed a neighbouring couple in the belief that they had helped the applicant to take the child out of their home; the applicant had been told that her father planned to take

Dans ces conditions, M'Hadji n'est pas fondé à soutenir que l'arrêté litigieux méconnait les stipulations précitées. 5.

been purchased until the right of pre-emption had been exercised and he had been paid compensation.

had a gun at home.

had been hit by projectiles, which had occurred while they had been carrying out their journalistic activities, had to be considered as amounting to such interference.

The applicant argued that he and X had not had intercourse.

It had been later established that the man who had absconded had been Mr M.Dz., who had been wanted by the authorities.

He had not witnessed who had set fire to the body but claimed that, as they had driven away, he had seen G. running around like a burning torch. 14 .

After Pi. had informed the applicant that he had done as asked, the applicant had paid him USD 3,000. 55 .

phone having been taken away; no explanation had been provided to him why he had to be detained; there had been no daylight; he had shared the cell with 4-5 persons, some of them adults; had been subjected

The Court found that the Turkish criminal-law system, as applied in the applicant’s case, had proven to be far from rigorous and had had no dissuasive effect.

She had first met X in school and they had kept their relationship secret. A few days after she had married, her relationship with X had become known when she had attempted to escape with him.

He had also shown them that the bottle had not been opened and had told them that they had no reason to fine A.F. who did not even have alcohol on him.

They had asked him about the identity of the person who had handed him the documents, and he had identified the first applicant.

He and his lawyer had both been heard at a public sitting and the Committee had given reasons for its findings.

The ACC had found that: the time devoted to one political party (PCRM) had been positive or neutral, whilst the time devoted to its opponent had been mostly negative; persons, institutions or political

Thus at the relevant time, he had had limited ties and his wife had had no ties to the country.

had been seriously hindered.

It noted, in particular, that it had not been established that in the moment when he got involved in a fight with Mr   Georgiev Mr O.V. had had a knife; moreover, as he had himself been stabbed by