CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1208JUD002991205
8 décembre 2011
The applicant pleaded guilty to all the charges, except for extortion of which he considered himself to have already been acquitted. 12.
Page 55 sur 692
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021REP002971796
21 octobre 1998
The applicant pleaded guilty to two of the charges of assault, was found guilty by the court-martial of the remaining charges and was sentenced to be dismissed from the navy. 20.
soc
61372380cd5801467740aa42
28 mars 2000
X..., en cassation d'un jugement rendu le 20 juin 1997 par le conseil de prud'hommes de Lyon (Section activités diverses), au profit de la société Locaservices Guille, société anonyme dont le siège
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-642
18 janvier 2011
Law – Article 8: Given the gravity of the conclusion contained in the police decision, namely that the applicant was guilty of a violent criminal offence, coupled with its disclosure to the insurance company
ECLI:CEDH:002-3468
28 février 2006
The applicant pleaded not guilty. At the trial before a district court the judge heard the testimony of one of the witnesses outside the courtroom and out of sight of the applicant and his counsel.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49317
13 décembre 1991
Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands pay to the applicant the sum of 1 900 guilders
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-138854
8 novembre 2013
On 15 March 2011 the Osijek County Court ( Županijski sud u Osijeku ) found the applicant guilty on charges of war crimes and sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment.
ECLI:CEDH:001-244551
8 juillet 2025
Herzegovina lodged on 26 November 2024 and 10 March 2025 respectively communicated on 8 July 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern criminal proceedings in which the applicants were found guilty
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC003271596
22 octobre 1997
S was also found guilty. A single judge gave the applicant and S leave to appeal. On 10 March 1994 the Court of Appeal rejected their appeal.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419DEC003421014
19 avril 2018
During the proceedings, the applicant pleaded not guilty and stated that he would present his defence at the end of the proceedings. 11.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-861855-884089
23 octobre 2003
He had been found guilty of being a member of an armed gang and sentenced to 12 years and 6 months’ imprisonment. Süvarioğulları and Others v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0202DEC002156003
2 février 2007
The applicant pleaded not guilty and claimed to have been only a passenger in Mr P.E.’s car and not to have been aware of the hidden ammunition.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0412DEC001615390
12 avril 1991
The Constitutional Court found no violation of constitutional rights, insofar as the applicant was found guilty of further violations of his professional obligations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0410DEC001800202
10 avril 2006
The reports did not contain any statements by the police or the judges, or any conclusions as to his possible guilt. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705DEC003654903
5 juillet 2005
On 19 June 2002 the Regional Court found the applicant guilty of premeditated murder and sentenced him to ten years in prison.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD004618208
5 juillet 2016
The court considered that none of them had seen any of the events themselves and that their impression that the applicant was guilty was because the bus driver blamed him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD002436004
21 juin 2011
The Prosecutor General argued that E.I. had been wrongfully convicted, as none of the evidence adduced was conclusive as to her guilt.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13143
16 février 2021
Both applicants pleaded guilty to the charges and were convicted. They later appealed unsuccessfully.
2ème chambre 2ème section
6633da3cc0d3e3fe99d17863
24 avril 2024
PRIMOVIE AVOCAT DEMANDERESSE représentée par Maître Séverine GUILLUY de la SELEURL LAWRIZON AVOCAT - #C1100 DEFENDERESSE S.A.R.L.
civ2
60794c0e9ba5988459c4484f
2 octobre 1981
ET DE LA SOCIETE GUILDE INTERNATIONALE DU DISQUE NE DEPASSAIT PAS LE TAUX DE COMPETENCE EN DERNIER RESSORT DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE, ALORS QU'EN REFUSANT DE PRENDRE EN CONSIDERATION, POUR DETERMINER LE MONTANT