CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

13 830 résultats pour « Guilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1208JUD002991205

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2011

8 décembre 2011

The applicant pleaded guilty to all the charges, except for extortion of which he considered himself to have already been acquitted. 12.

Source officielle

Page 55 sur 692

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021REP002971796

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

The applicant pleaded guilty to two of the charges of assault, was found guilty by the court-martial of the remaining charges and was sentenced to be dismissed from the navy.   20.

Source officielle
CC

soc

61372380cd5801467740aa42

Cassation

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

X..., en cassation d'un jugement rendu le 20 juin 1997 par le conseil de prud'hommes de Lyon (Section activités diverses), au profit de la société Locaservices Guille, société anonyme dont le siège

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-642

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2011

18 janvier 2011

Law – Article 8: Given the gravity of the conclusion contained in the police decision, namely that the applicant was guilty of a violent criminal offence, coupled with its disclosure to the insurance company

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3468

Admin. suprême

28 février 2006

28 février 2006

The applicant pleaded not guilty. At the trial before a district court the judge heard the testimony of one of the witnesses outside the courtroom and out of sight of the applicant and his counsel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49317

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 1991

13 décembre 1991

Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands pay to the applicant the sum of 1 900 guilders

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-138854

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2013

8 novembre 2013

On 15 March 2011 the Osijek County Court ( Županijski sud u Osijeku ) found the applicant guilty on charges of war crimes and sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244551

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

Herzegovina lodged on 26 November 2024 and 10 March 2025 respectively communicated on 8 July 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern criminal proceedings in which the applicants were found guilty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC003271596

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1997

22 octobre 1997

S was also found guilty. A single judge gave the applicant and S leave to appeal. On 10 March 1994 the Court of Appeal rejected their appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419DEC003421014

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2018

19 avril 2018

    During the proceedings, the applicant pleaded not guilty and stated that he would present his defence at the end of the proceedings. 11.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-861855-884089

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2003

23 octobre 2003

He had been found guilty of being a member of an armed gang and sentenced to 12 years and 6 months’ imprisonment.   Süvarioğulları and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0202DEC002156003

Admin. suprême

2 février 2007

2 février 2007

The applicant pleaded not guilty and claimed to have been only a passenger in Mr   P.E.’s car and not to have been aware of the hidden ammunition.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0412DEC001615390

Admin. suprême

12 avril 1991

12 avril 1991

  The Constitutional Court found no violation of constitutional rights, insofar as the applicant was found guilty of further violations of his professional obligations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0410DEC001800202

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2006

10 avril 2006

The reports did not contain any statements by the police or the judges, or any conclusions as to his possible guilt. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705DEC003654903

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

On 19 June 2002 the Regional Court found the applicant guilty of premeditated murder and sentenced him to ten years in prison.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD004618208

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2016

5 juillet 2016

The court considered that none of them had seen any of the events themselves and that their impression that the applicant was guilty was because the bus driver blamed him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD002436004

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

The Prosecutor General argued that E.I. had been wrongfully convicted, as none of the evidence adduced was conclusive as to her guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13143

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

Both applicants pleaded guilty to the charges and were convicted. They later appealed unsuccessfully.

Source officielle
TJ

2ème chambre 2ème section

6633da3cc0d3e3fe99d17863

T. Judiciaire

24 avril 2024

24 avril 2024

PRIMOVIE AVOCAT DEMANDERESSE représentée par Maître Séverine GUILLUY de la SELEURL LAWRIZON AVOCAT - #C1100 DEFENDERESSE S.A.R.L.

Source officielle
CC

civ2

60794c0e9ba5988459c4484f

Cassation

2 octobre 1981

2 octobre 1981

ET DE LA SOCIETE GUILDE INTERNATIONALE DU DISQUE NE DEPASSAIT PAS LE TAUX DE COMPETENCE EN DERNIER RESSORT DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE, ALORS QU'EN REFUSANT DE PRENDRE EN CONSIDERATION, POUR DETERMINER LE MONTANT

Source officielle