finding of this breach constituted sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained;   – held that the respondent state was to pay the applicant, within three months, 50 000 French

with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant company as just satisfaction, within three months, the sum of 60   000 French

francs, including VAT, less 9 758 French francs for costs and expenses, and that simple interest at an annual rate of 6,65% should be payable from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until

adopted on 9   February 1996, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 7 500 French

June 1998, in accordance with former Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French

In a fresh application to the European Court, the applicants complained under Article   6 of the Convention that the domestic courts’ decision not to reopen the compensation proceedings constituted

According to information provided by the Home Office to the French authorities, the decision-makers did not believe he was related to the second applicant.

adopted on 15   November 1996, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 30 000 French

on 28 January 1997, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 200 000 French

(The judgment is available only in French.)   (2)   Kamil T. Sürek v.

July   1997, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, the sum of 30 000 French

  Appendix to Final Resolution ResDH(2002)62 Information provided by the Government of France during the examination of the Durrand case by the Committee of Ministers The French government points

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 5 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 35 000 French francs and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum at

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 20 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 50 000 French francs and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum at

From 2018 onwards the French authorities investigated EncroChat, an encrypted mobile-phone telecommunications tool which operated as a closed network.

Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 30 000 French

administratif de Poitiers d'annuler pour excès de pouvoir l'arrêté du 31 août 2018 par lequel la préfète de la Charente a, d'une part, déclaré d'utilité publique le projet de requalification d'une friche

préemption, dès lors que cette décision est fondée sur le projet communal de redynamisation du centre-ville d'Oyonnax et d'aménagement des berges du Lange pour lutter contre le risque d'inondation, la friche