On 5 May 1998 a constitutional judge expressed the view that there had been undue delays in the proceedings concerning the applicant’s cases.

His application to postpone the proceedings on 29   March 2018 for health-related reasons had been the only delay attributable to him and that had been insignificant compared to the overall delay

    The Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without undue Delay 38.

The delay in hearing the action de novo, when weighed against the necessity of hearing witnesses and assessing their veracity, was not unreasonable or unjustified in the circumstances.

  The Government pointed out that the delay in fixing the date of the trial hearing was due to the workload of the Cosenza District Court and noted that the lawyer of the applicant’s own choosing

It ordered the District Court to avoid further delays and to reimburse the applicant's legal costs.

    Relevant domestic law and practice Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay.

The aggregated length of such delays is approximately one year and nine months.

Administrative formalities connected with release cannot justify a delay of more than a few hours (see Nikolov v.   Bulgaria , no. 38884/97, § 82, 30 January 2003).

These procedural motions thus caused a delay of altogether five months at the most.

    Proceedings concerning the claim for non-pecuniary damage on account of the alleged delays in the above proceedings 24.

Consequently, the Government maintained that there had been no delays in the proceedings for which the authorities could be held responsible.

Accordingly the State party has to be held responsible for any breach of the Convention resulting from such delays.

It had to be established whether or not there had been a delay which, at least in principle, constituted grounds for a claim for compensation; different delays at different stages of the proceedings had

He therefore decided to leave the decision on delay and any appropriate remedy until after the trial had taken place.

He therefore decided to leave the decision on delay and any appropriate remedy until after the trial had taken place.

Maroc) 26 rue des Terrasses 38360 SASSENAGE représentée par Me Hervé GERBI de la SELARL GERBI, avocat au barreau de GRENOBLE INTIMEE : SCP ACTIMEMORI NOTAIRES ASSOCIES, (anciennement SCP DELAYE

  He contends that the delay between his alleged desertion and his arrest, coupled with the delay before the Indian courts, together with the disturbance of the applicant's life in the United Kingdom

] SELARL FIDES ES Q LIQUIDATEUR DE LA STE S2IB [Adresse 5] comparant par Me Kazim KAYA [Adresse 3] et par Me [O] [A] [Adresse 6] DEFENDEURS SCI ANTONY BOURDEAU [Adresse 7] comparant par Me Nicole DELAY