accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 5 August 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

  Length of contested detention Continuation of detention after completion of extradition proceedings properly so-called: resulted from successive applications for stay of execution of extradition

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 21   October 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

against the applicant, in particular the alleged failure by the domestic courts to observe the principle of equality of arms concerning the collection and examination of evidence, including the witness called

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15   January 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

      Decides that no further action is called for in this case.    

  They also commented that since the officer had not been called as a witness, his evidence was not before the jury and played no part in the applicant's conviction.

In 1997 he was called again to serve as a juror, but failed to appear and was fined approximately EUR 240. As the applicant failed to pay the fine, he was summoned before the Criminal Court.

Neighbours called the police who arrived at the scene shortly after 1.30 a.m.

[E.] called from [a   restaurant] to a hotel ... and announced that [C.] was already on the way.

The police officers called for an ambulance and placed P. in the lateral safety position.

    On 15 August 2014 at 10.24 p.m. one of the applicant’s neighbours called the police to complain about the fact that the applicant had been listening to music very loudly in his room.

dispute between the applicant and the foreign couple Mr and Mrs I. about their alleged unlawful parking, he had stated that “they came from the Balkan and did not know about German law”, and he had called

When the officers discovered that there was a baby in the flat, and as it was not sure whether she had been affected by the tear gas, an ambulance was called.

The Court nevertheless found that an interference with the freedom of expression of a member of the legal service in a position such as the applicant’s called for close scrutiny on its part.

  The Court observed that a change in the composition of a court after the examination of a decisive witness normally led to the witness being called to give evidence again.

The applicants alleged that the special intervention team also called Mr   Ion Boacă’s 13-year-old son (M.B.) and daughter-in-law (M.D.)

MORGAN Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Me Yoave FENNECH Me Jérôme COUTELIER-TAFANI Me Romain CALLEN Prononcée à la suite d'une assignation en référé en date du 07

AU SOUTIEN DE L'EDIFICE ; QU'ENTERINANT, SUR CE POINT, LE RAPPORT DE L'EXPERT JUDICIAIRE, ILS ONT EN OUTRE RELEVE DIVERS VICES DE LA CONSTRUCTION ET PLUS PRECISEMENT LA POSE DE CES GLACES SUR DES CALES

LA COUR D'APPEL N'A PAS REPONDU AU CHEF DE CONCLUSIONS PRISES PAR L'EXPEDITEUR POUR REPROCHER AU TRANSPORTEUR D'AVOIR CHARGE LE CONTENEUR EN " SHELTER DECK ", C'EST-A-DIRE SUR LE PONT ET NON DANS LA CALE