HCHR’s criminal complaint on behalf of the applicant 16.

On 24 July 1996 the mayor filed a petition, on behalf of the residents, with the office of the Prime Minister requesting permission to return to their village.

officielle, à défaut de contestation, à savoir qu'Alexis de B... aurait été victime de quelqu'un très lié à son entourage mais aussi très proche de la police, empoisonné, son cadavre aurait été retrouvé un beau

Her mother instituted proceedings in her own name and on behalf of her child to have the paternity of the father recognised.

particular, did the refusal of the domestic courts to grant the applicant’s motions to call H.M. and A.O. as defence witnesses violate his right to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf

against Romania lodged on 7 October 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns allegations that the authorities did not appropriately respond to the complaint of domestic violence lodged on behalf

Law : Article 5(4) – No court had ever ruled on the two applications for immediate release lodged with the President of the tribunal de grande instance on the applicant’s behalf.

Furthermore he underlines that his request to hear a witness on his behalf in appeal was rejected. The judges, in the applicant's opinion, have wrongly assessed the evidence before them. 63.

C... est propriétaire d’un bien immobilier situé au 19 rue Amédée de Béhague à Dampierre-en-Burly (Loiret).

Après avoir entendu au cours de l'audience publique du 26 juin 2025 à 10h30 : - le rapport de Mme Corneloup, juge des référés ; - les observations de Me Behague, assisté de Mme Dupont, avocate en

Diard, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Behague, représentant la SCEA du Mas Saint-Jean.

          The facts of the case, as submitted on behalf of the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The second applicant lodged his complaint on behalf of his son, A.Ş., who disappeared while in custody.

Despite repeated requests made on my behalf, he has refused, failed and neglected either to destroy the said negatives and copies or to deliver them up to me.

    COMPLAINT           The applicant complains that his right to have the witness B.Ö. examined on his behalf has been violated.

    On 8 December 2006 the applicant brought a civil action against the Agency before the Zagreb Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Zagrebu) on his own behalf and on behalf of B.C and Č.D., seeking

    On 19 February 1996 the applicant requested the Minister of Justice to lodge a cassation appeal against this judgment on his behalf.

On 19 January 2011 counsel on behalf of H. lodged a complaint before the Federal Constitutional Court in which he complained about the forced medication.

It is not entirely clear as to whether the lawyer, as claimed by the applicant, took the liberty of making unsolicited submissions on his behalf (see in this regard Aladashvili v.