AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1211DEC007800801
11 décembre 2003
11 décembre 2003
On 11 August 1994 the applicant filed an action for damages in the Zadar Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Zadru ) against the Croatia Insurance Company ( Croatia osiguranje ), because the building was
Source officielleciv1
613721f1cd580146773f8f03
5 avril 1993
5 avril 1993
Bechara X..., demeurant à Rabieh (Liban), pris en sa qualité de liquidateur de la succession de M. Mikhaël Z...
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Besançon
ORTA_2201790_20230214
14 février 2023
14 février 2023
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 4 novembre 2022, la SA Pacifica, représentée par Me Bechari, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision par laquelle le centre hospitalier
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253c944bd3db21cbdd87c85
26 octobre 2005
26 octobre 2005
BERNAUD, Conseiller faisant fonction de Président de Chambre, Madame F. Y..., Conseillère, Monsieur J.P.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253c9cfbd3db21cbdd89468
23 janvier 2007
23 janvier 2007
Comparante concluante par Me CAUSSAIN, avoué à la Cour et plaidant par Me BERTHAUD de la SCP SABLON LEEMAN ET BERTHAUD, avocats au barreau de BEAUVAIS ET : INTIME Monsieur Rémi Y..
Source officielleChambre Commerciale
615e0e60c25a97f0381f55ae
3 juillet 2014
3 juillet 2014
Représentée par Me Roxane LOUBET, avocat au barreau de VALENCE COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DELIBERE : Madame Dominique ROLIN, Président de Chambre, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC002375994
20 mai 1998
20 mai 1998
The court underlined that the applicant's request for access to his son had not been dismissed because of the binding effect of the ban on his stay in Austria, but because the contacts would not
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003804597
31 août 1999
31 août 1999
They note that in the large majority of these hearings, the procedure was adjourned at counsel’s request and because the applicant was prevented from being present.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC000024902
1 juin 2006
1 juin 2006
The court also held: “The establishment of this fact has legal meaning for Mr Arkhipov because it is decisive for the personal pecuniary rights of the plaintiff.”
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3285
15 juin 2006
15 juin 2006
She also considered that she had been deprived of any means of advertising her business – even though it was not illegal – because of the existence of a provision in the Criminal Code making it an offence
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172959
21 mars 2017
21 mars 2017
According to the letter, the body was transported during the night with a black car and the investigation conducted by the police could have been arranged because the suspects had high-ranking relatives
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111068
10 avril 2012
10 avril 2012
The Regional Court noted that in his appeal the applicant had indicated that he had confessed and that he would not evade investigation because he had to repay a credit to a bank.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113369
7 septembre 2012
7 septembre 2012
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that his trial was not fair because the judge had formed a pre-conceived idea of his guilt, because the main witness, Ms Sh., did not
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127704
2 octobre 2013
2 octobre 2013
that she had been badly treated by the medical staff, that the decisions concerning her deprivation of liberty were unlawful and unjustified and that her reputation in the community had been ruined because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155939
11 juin 2015
11 juin 2015
Such a contract is not null and void, because a contract on sale of the other’s object obliges the contractual parties (section 460 of the Obligations Act).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162398
30 mars 2016
30 mars 2016
He asked for an extension of the time-limit for appeal, claiming that it had been missed because the applicant had not been represented at the time and had insufficient command of Russian to understand
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-828
14 septembre 2010
14 septembre 2010
He claimed that he had not been able to challenge the termination of his contract before the domestic courts because, since the entrance to the local court building was not specially adapted, he could
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-153747
16 mars 2015
16 mars 2015
On 1 May 2007 police officers took a number of security measures in Istanbul because of May the First International Labour Day celebrations and there was therefore a large police presence on the streets
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160888
26 janvier 2016
26 janvier 2016
At about 3 p.m. his assistant was brought to move him to another car, because the first one was going to be impounded as physical evidence.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209224
18 mars 2021
18 mars 2021
The applicant in application no. 21694/20 was fined on 25 August 2018 because he had participated in a gathering at the Arc de Triomphe in Bucharest which had not been notified to the authorities and had
Source officiellePage 55 sur 1499