CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 493 résultats pour « Alexandre BECAUD »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0125JUD003876615

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2018

25 janvier 2018

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,  

Page 55 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127DEC005842813

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2018

27 novembre 2018

In the absence of an appeal on points of law by the public prosecutor within fifteen days, the decision became final. 4.     Procedure for removal from office as a senator 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0111JUD002981396

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2000

11 janvier 2000

    On 30 December 1992 the applicant brought an action in damages against the State before the ordinary courts (Seventeenth Civil Division of the Lisbon Court of First Instance) because of its

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD003909313

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2014

17 avril 2014

He claimed, among other things, that the criminal case against him had been opened exclusively because of his ethnic origin and that he would face a real risk of ill-treatment in Kyrgyzstan if returned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2018

13 septembre 2018

4) regime Post Scriptum   In the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0409JUD007278012

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2015

9 avril 2015

    The applicant did not appeal against this decision, and it became final on 15 March 2011. 32 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD000295314

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

I had no intention of not declaring the speargun because I already had it with me when entering Bosnia and Herzegovina ...” 7 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD003648712

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2016

15 décembre 2016

Such interviews became effective only in respect of children aged four years or more. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2021

25 mai 2021

On 13   September 2018, a Chamber of that Section, composed of Linos ‑ Alexandre Sicilianos, Kristina Pardalos, Aleš Pejchal, Ksenija Turković, Armen   Harutyunyan, Pauliine Koskelo and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD005731910

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2012

18 décembre 2012

First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Nina Vajić,   Anatoly Kovler,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC002644812

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

Meanwhile, the zealots who dreamed up this policy will sleep easy on their futons because they are putting the ‘health needs’ of kids in care first.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD005303608

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2014

9 janvier 2014

The second applicant told the investigators that Isa and Usman Eskiyev might have been abducted because of their kinship with Dalambek Eskiyev. 43.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0606JUD003845005

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2013

6 juin 2013

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Chamber), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0606JUD000158509

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2013

6 juin 2013

The fourth applicant had been unable to consult the medical institution where she had previously been treated because of the threat that her medical file would again be disclosed. 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD002099914

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2015

21 mai 2015

    According to the letter from the police chief in Namangan, Uzbekistan, dated 8 April 2013, the applicant forfeited his Uzbek nationality because of his unaccounted absence from the country

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD000599308

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2013

28 novembre 2013

Because of the disability, the applicant was not obligated to work. He was offered a job in a sewing shop where the working conditions were appropriate for his disability. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD007092311

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2014

9 janvier 2014

Section 371 of the Obligations Act provided that claims became time-barred after five years, if no other statutory limitation period was prescribed by law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004082012

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

The Government pointed out that it had not been necessary to allow the applicant to cross-examine the police officer who had drafted the report at the trial because there had been no indication that he

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0411JUD001881306

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2013

11 avril 2013

    However, there is no need for the Court to establish the truthfulness of each and every allegation concerning the number of inmates per cell, because it finds a violation of Article 3 on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD002070204

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

She had been restricted in her ability to prepare her defence because of limited access to the case file and owing to the conditions of her detention and transport; she had been refused permission to study

Source officielle