CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD000494107
6 octobre 2015
The applicant alleged, in particular, that the criminal proceedings against him had not been fair in so far as he had been convicted without evidence being heard directly either from him
Page 54 sur 101900
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0604JUD001551719
4 juin 2020
THE FACTS 3. The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD001048513
21 mai 2015
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308JUD001906112
8 mars 2018
THE FACTS 3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0722JUD003615708
22 juillet 2014
THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5. The applicant is a company incorporated in Moldova. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD003633513
19 mars 2019
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0602JUD006517317
2 juin 2022
The Court has also held that in such cases weighty reasons would need to be put forward to justify the fact that the costs of proceedings were equal or higher to the plaintiff’s financial award in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703JUD001225706
3 juillet 2018
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0427JUD004712410
27 avril 2021
THE FACTS 3. The applicant, who was born in 1973, lives in Konya. He was represented by Mr Ümit Olgun, a lawyer practising in Konya. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD002608205
26 juin 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609JUD002513213
9 juin 2015
The applicant company had acquired the property in good faith and the present action could not be used to contest that. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312JUD001047916
12 mars 2026
The Court reiterates that the right to a fair hearing must be interpreted in the light of the rule of law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD004810516
24 janvier 2023
In his application to the Court the applicant complained that he had been incited to commit a criminal offence, in breach of his right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD005948721
19 octobre 2023
THE FACTS 4. The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD005466416
Ministry for European and International Affairs; the information given to the Serbian Government regarding their right to intervene in the proceedings pursuant to Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and the fact
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD003085409
22 septembre 2022
The Court, being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, considers that applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD005625515
16 janvier 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD000251511
20 février 2020
THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4. The applicant was born in 1989 and lives in Baku. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309JUD006741411
9 mars 2023
He had merely wished to bring up his children in accordance with his values and the principles of the Catholic faith.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD004964007
16 juillet 2015