It further made reference to judgment no. 3677 of 2009 of the Court of Cassation, the declared purpose of which was to ensure effective protection to public managers unlawfully dismissed, whose contract

grant the applicants anonymity ex officio (Rule 47   §   4 of the Rules of Court); the parties’ observations; the letter from the French Government informing the Court that they do not wish to make

Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made

  2082/23 have standing to introduce complaints in the name of late Mr   Uliasz (for general principles, see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

    The applicant worked for the Rijeka Municipality until 1991, when she was made redundant. On 29 July 1992 she obtained a judgment against the Municipality ordering her reinstatement.

The debtor also had to make a list of its obligations to creditors. 6 .

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

  Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), as well as to awards made by the Court to some of the applicants earlier (see, for example, Rybakov and Others v.

On 5 June 2013 the Baku City Executive Authority made several amendments to the order, including the substitution of A. company with P.A. Housing Construction Cooperative (“P.A.”). 4.

it has recognised the standing of the victim’s next-of-kin to submit an application even if the next-of-kin was not involved in the domestic procedure ( see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Azerbaijan (application no. 19853/03) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 The applicant, Valentina Akimova, is an Azerbaijani national who was born in 1950 and lives in Baku (Azerbaijan).

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

His repeated acts of self-aggression proved that he did not understand that he needed to make efforts for social reintegration.

    On 17 December 2021 the Migration Agency rejected the first applicant’s request for asylum and a residence permit, which had been made on the basis of family ties to his wife and children

The second rule, in the second sentence of the same paragraph, covers deprivation of possessions and makes it subject to certain conditions.

    The assailants threatened the applicants and made xenophobic remarks in connection with the applicants’ affiliation with the Greenpeace, which, according to them, was a “foreign” (that is

The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

emphasised that persons in detention are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities have a duty to protect their physical well-being and that any recourse to physical force which has not been made