with reasoning that had failed to clarify the question as to why it had been necessary to bring that charge in the first place.

been entered into, so the legislature had to focus on other policy choices, and that long-term perspectives also had to be borne in mind when enacting relevant legislation.

He had lived there for the great majority of his life, during which time he had had two sons who lived with their five children in Switzerland and to whom he claimed to be very close.

in principle had had a statutory basis and, as required by the domestic law, the warrants had been issued by a judge.

with reasoning that had failed to clarify the question as to why it had been necessary to bring that charge in the first place.

Further, by examining the merits of their complaint, the District Court had recognised that the applicants had had standing under the domestic law to bring proceedings and seek remedies in connection with

The applicant had been taken to hospital by her parents, who had stated that she had previously joined the Believers in God religious sect ( Dievo tikėjimo sekta ) and that she had become agitated and

He had not had any enemies and had got along with everyone; the attack had been accidental. A.Č. had asked the governor to be moved to Block   8, where he knew another inmate.

It had therefore been difficult to arrest the offenders and the officers had had to call for backup.

, the fact that he had not seen his son on those dates had not been O.’s fault. 7 .

and had only done so on the basis of a photograph of him which had been shown to Mr R. after the events had taken place.

The applicants complained that they had been subject to a collective expulsion and had had no remedy at their disposal in this respect, in breach of Article   4 of Protocol No.

In February 2011 he had been released and had returned to his parents’ home.

The applicant had contended that since the seizure had taken place immediately after the items in question had been returned to his lawyer, he had been deprived of the opportunity to confer with him and

They had taken them to a separate room where they had forced them to read military statutes and to do push-ups at the same time. At some point the applicant’s son had collapsed.

breastfeeding had stopped.

The applicant had gone back to work. Until 7 May 2007 nothing had happened.

However, he had not been diagnosed as suffering from epileptic seizures and no specific recommendations had been made.

which had helped create the impression that the applicant had committed crimes before his guilt had been proved in court.