Both noted that political expression was a highly prized form of expression. However, they found the interference to be justified.

of his both thighs and on the front part of the left thigh.

The court’s reasoning observed that: “In the present case, it is beyond any doubt that both parents provide for their children a very good environment for their development, both financially, and also

[O] [X] né le [Date naissance 1] 1995 à [Localité 3] demeurant [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] ; Comparant Assisté par Me Josée ISRAËL - AARPI BOTHIS - avocat au barreau de Paris (C1857) Vu les pièces

PAR CES MOTIFS, Déclarons l'appel formé par le [Adresse 7] irrecevable ; Condamnons le syndicat des copropriétaires de la résidence botanique aux dépens ; Condamnons le [Adresse 7] à payer à

() Les procédés scientifiques auxquels il est recouru pour la constatation sont les traitements de données topographiques, météorologiques, marégraphiques, houlographiques, morpho-sédimentaires, botaniques

The court observed that the absence of both parents’ agreement to the issuing of a passport to their child was not sufficient grounds to justify a refusal.

In both cases, it called for the launching of criminal and disciplinary proceedings against both police officers and municipal officials who had been involved in the eviction, while it also called upon

The applicant appealed against both decisions.

Both applicants continued to exercise their judicial duties at that newly created judicial body. 7.

Doctors were present at both birchings.

Both parties would appear to bear some responsibility for many of those delays.

Taking into account as the value of the subject ‑ matter in dispute both the primary and the subsidiary (alternative) claims, the second-instance court held that the applicant had succeeded only

[A] has also been very prominent in business, both here and abroad, and in both a negative and positive light.

It considered that X had developed adequately for his age both cognitively and socially since the placement.

Central to the Committee’s recommendations and to the policy of the legislation was the primacy of the continuing consent to IVF treatment by both parties to the treatment.

of a tenancy of the same flat instituted by W.F. were already pending and that both cases would be joined.

on both sides of the lower third of D.’s neck.

It transpires that after the placement, both children had shown positive progress.