The Probate Court had been warned many times, had repeatedly been requested to intervene and its attention had been drawn to suspicion that the family business was not run in a manner consistent with the

Berro-Lefevre, judges , and V. Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 9 November 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

No other ground for declaring it inadmissible has been established. 2.

    The court further noted that an application for prosecution had been lodged in time.

She also instituted administrative proceedings in which she claimed compensation for buildings which had been located on the plot in 1959 and which had later been destroyed.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 2 that his right to be presumed innocent had been violated as he had been dismissed from his work and had not been reinstated on account of the

    The Court reiterates that an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and

not been allowed to return to their village.

The court concluded that the impugned decision had been taken in conformity with the law.

M. against a decision by which she had been refused to be granted, by way of an administrative decision, the right to a lease of the apartment in issue.

  The decision of 29 January 1999 in which the measure had been ordered by the chief of police had been sent by the Directorate in February 1999 to Mr Ignatov’s permanent address in Kotlentsi, within

  1 that the authorities had delayed in paying them the additional compensation and that at a time when the annual rate of inflation in Turkey had been very high, they had been paid insufficient interest

He insists that two of the judges composing the Audiencia provicial of Málaga had been challenged by his lawyer.

It found that the following delays had been unnecessary and were attributable to the judicial organs: although the Office of the Public Prosecutor of Hamburg had been in possession of most of the relevant

He denied the veracity of the statements that had been taken from him by the police and alleged that he had been subjected to torture while in police custody.

Between 1995 and 1998 they had been convicted and sentenced for having refused to serve in the army allegedly only because Parliament had been slow in adopting a law establishing substitute service for

Vu les dernières conclusions remises et notifiées le 11 juillet 2024, aux termes desquelles la société Berner demande à la cour d'appel de : - recevoir la société Berner en son appel et toutes ses demandes

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.

Stork, a lawyer practising in Berge. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , of the Federal Ministry of Justice.