CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD004384211

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2019

4 juillet 2019

This was not because we considered that it was wrong to award the applicant company just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damages but on the contrary because we considered that the applicant was entitled

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115414

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2012

21 novembre 2012

On 1 October 2001 the applicant requested that the court order a fine, because the child’s mother did not cooperate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117010

Admin. suprême

6 février 2013

6 février 2013

This was so because by the time the applicant had bought the property, Mr S. had already paid off the judgment debt, which meant that the enforcement proceedings had had to be discontinued; there had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173633

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2017

26 avril 2017

By a decision of 6 July 2011 the Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the applicant’s constitutional complaint because the case did not raise any constitutional issue.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155110

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

Because his economic situation was very difficult, the applicant eventually agreed to try to procure cocaine. He alleges that Mike subsequently called him almost every day asking for the drugs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709DEC000140022

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2024

9 juillet 2024

They argued in that connection that they had been unable to make an advance payment themselves and had thus been discriminated against because of their financial situation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215020

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

On the other hand, you had others who remained passive, either because of lethargy or because they were satisfied with the situation as stood.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0513DEC005777616

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2025

13 mai 2025

    The Government submitted that the complaints under Article 6 of the Convention should be dismissed because the applicant had failed to exhaust effective domestic remedies. 34.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122652

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2013

18 juin 2013

On 4 December 2008 the second applicant left the vocational school because he did not cope with his study duties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC001580804

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

Two hearings were adjourned because the judge was involved in other proceedings, five because of the judge’s illness, two because the judge was on leave, and one because he was travelling on official business

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD004054304

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2008

4 décembre 2008

An adjustment for the cost of living was equally inadequate because it did not compensate non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141183

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2014

22 janvier 2014

The prosecutor concluded that the fire had broken out because of M.M.’s fault and that he had died as a result of his burns.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD004008103

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2008

14 novembre 2008

The applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies because he had not complained to courts about the Ministry of Finance’s negligence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206DEC000251215

Admin. suprême

6 février 2025

6 février 2025

However, the Court does not consider it necessary to answer this question definitively because the applications are in any event inadmissible for the reasons set out below.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0530DEC003492521

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2024

30 mai 2024

The applicant complained that her extradition would violate Article 3 of the Convention because, if extradited, she risked ill-treatment in a Russian prison because of a conflict between her partner and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917DEC001049521

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2024

17 septembre 2024

Seventeen other hearings were adjourned because of the nationwide lockdowns announced during the COVID-19 pandemic (from March to May 2020 and from November 2020 to April 2021), during which the courts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317DEC001726823

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2026

17 mars 2026

In addition, he alleged that he had lost earnings because he had no longer been able to perform his part-time job (as a taxi driver).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC001706406

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2009

30 juin 2009

The applicant did not have the right to the restitution of property within the statutory time-limit until 31 December 2001 because he had not been a Lithuanian citizen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC007193301

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2004

30 mars 2004

He submitted, in particular, that the regulation of 28 September 1999 had not been valid and enforceable because it had never been officially published.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC000564307

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

He has been unfit for service because of illness ( dienstunfähig krank ) since then.

Source officielle

Page 54 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →