The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4 .

    The applicant did in fact decide to maintain her legal aid application.

de licenciement est motivée par un comportement fautif, il appartient à l'inspecteur du travail et, le cas échéant, au ministre, de rechercher, sous le contrôle du juge de l'excès de pouvoir, si les faits

LICENCIEMENT EST MOTIVEE PAR UN COMPORTEMENT FAUTIF, IL APPARTIENT A L'INSPECTEUR DU TRAVAIL ET, LE CAS ECHEANT, AU MINISTRE DU TRAVAIL DE RECHERCHER, SOUS LE CONTROLE DU JUGE DE L'EXCES DE POUVOIR, SI LES FAUTES

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS 3.     The applicant’s and his lawyer’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1955 and lives in Edineț.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 6.

before them, establish facts and interpret domestic law (see Ayetullah Ay , cited above, § 123, with further references).

    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. The incident and its aftermath 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicants were born in 1959, 1950 and 1952 respectively, and live in Brestovec Orehovički and Krapina respectively. 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1969 and until his conviction lived in Vologda. A.     Conviction 6.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

While they argued that the time-limit for lodging an appeal was 20 days, in fact it was 15 days as per Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the version in force in December 2005.

Accordingly, the Government argued that the domestic authorities had examined the applicant’s complaint carefully and had established that the facts alleged by him were untrue.

  21826/16 and the complaint concerning the right to a fair hearing in application no. 21784/16, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the latter application; the parties’ observations; Having

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1958 and lives in Moscow.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.