During the investigation, data were retrieved from the seized mobile phones of L. and his wife. They contained a conversation of chat messages between L.’s wife and B.

    On 19 May 1994 the head of the BDILS(NR) advised two PSS investigators (who had by then arrived in Washington) that his own wife, the nanny, the applicant’s wife and another (female) employee

The applicant has a step-daughter by his wife. His step-daughter is twenty-two years of age.

The applicant also unsuccessfully requested investigation authorities to appoint his wife as his “lay defender”.

On 3 February 2005 the applicant informed the Court that he could continue to act on his own behalf, or his wife could represent him.

Section II] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Free expression of opinion of people Alleged misadministration of electoral rolls, presidential control over electoral commissions and finalisation of country-wide

His wife and children remained in Peci. After the ‘Fall of Srebrenica’ in 1995 the applicant’s wife and children fled to Špionica situated in the Tuzla canton where the majority population is Muslim.

In the meanwhile, the tenant died and on 11 October 1999, his wife asked the Salerno Magistrate to suspend the enforcement proceedings.

The applicant is still living in Austria with his wife and their youngest son. Proceedings relating to the applicant’s request for a residence title on humanitarian grounds are currently pending.

1.9.2022 [Section I] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Applicant’s conviction and fine for manufacturing cannabis for personal treatment of chronic pain, without prescription, within State’s wide

text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Note d’information sur la jurisprudence de la Cour 11 Octobre 1999 Wille

His wife and 5 children remained in India from 1965 until 1968 when they joined him in the United Kingdom.

Mr McErlane The applicant’s wife died on 19 February 1999, leaving him with three children born in 1985, 1988 and 1990.

During the eight months of his pre-trial detention, the applicant’s wife requested on several occasions to be allowed a conjugal visit to the applicant, but without success.

The applicant and his wife appealed, claiming, inter alia , that Judge G. had not been impartial.

Having been alerted by the first applicant’s ex-wife in 2006, the public prosecutor’s office brought proceedings in 2007 to have the new marriage declared null and void.

In his statement to the police he claimed that he and his wife, who frequently argued about her mother interfering in their marriage, had had an argument which had got out of hand.

la décision : - est entachée d'une erreur d'appréciation en ce que FranceAgriMer a refusé de considérer comme dépenses éligibles les opérations de publicité facturées par la société Shanken pour le Wine

    The applicant trade union was set up by the employees of the country ‑ wide chain of shops owned by the company “Aelia Polska Ltd” (thereafter, the “Aelia company”).