CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

24 481 résultats pour « Senut »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311DEC000378518

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2021

11 mars 2021

By letter dated 17 September 2019, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations   had expired on 5 December

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409DEC002164109

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2013

9 avril 2013

On 8 January 2013 the letter sent to the applicant returned to the Court as unclaimed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC003504206

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

By letter dated 9 May 2011, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the observations had expired on 8 March 2011, and that no extension

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238628

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2024

19 novembre 2024

Türkiye lodged on 17 August 2020 communicated on 19 November 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the refusal of the prison administration to hand over certain web page printouts sent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0401DEC002530906

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2014

1 avril 2014

The letter sent to the prison was returned back to the Court, with the note on the envelope that the applicant had been released.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC007252613

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2022

20 janvier 2022

On 6 November 2020 the Registry sent a letter, asking the applicant to appoint a representative by 15 January 2021. No reply followed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0904DEC003444223

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2025

4 septembre 2025

By letters dated 4 March and 6 May 2025, both sent to the address provided by the applicant, the applicant was again invited to appoint a legal representative and to return the enclosed authority form

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918DEC005689319

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2025

18 septembre 2025

Given that the previous correspondence sent to the applicant’s place of detention had been sent back to the Registry, the applicant having no longer been detained at that prison, the Government’s observations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925DEC004819809

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

The envelope containing the Government’s observations was sent back with the mention that the applicant’s address was incomplete.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0622DEC005803712

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2023

22 juin 2023

By letter dated 22 September 2021, sent through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms),   the Government’s observations were forwarded to the applicants’ lawyer, and he was invited

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022DEC000649711

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2015

22 octobre 2015

By letters dated 23 April 2015, sent by registered post to the applicant’s home address and to his representative, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC004075709

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2015

21 avril 2015

No reply was received to the first letter, and the second letter which had been sent by registered post was returned as “unclaimed”. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC001832009

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2017

10 octobre 2017

The letter sent to the applicant’s representative was delivered to the destination post office on 6 June 2017.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC007849011

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2016

27 septembre 2016

The letter, sent to the prison in which the applicant had been serving his sentence, was returned unopened with an annotation that the applicant was no longer detained.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC003809504

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2010

16 mars 2010

By another letter dated 11 May 2009, sent by registered post, the applicant was reminded about the necessity to be legally represented at that stage of the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915DEC002267908

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2009

15 septembre 2009

On 22 December 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants who were requested to submit any observations in reply together with any claims for just satisfaction by 2   February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC003681502

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

Between May 2008 and March 2009, the Court sent four letters to the applicant, inviting her to designate a representative, in accordance with paragraph 4 (a) of Rule 36 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0307DEC000517921

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2024

7 mars 2024

The observations were sent to the applicant via eComms and he was invited to submit his own observations by 27 April 2023.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243901

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2025

26 mai 2025

Türkiye and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 26 May 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the decisions of prison administrations to withhold various periodicals sent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1124DEC004105516

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2022

24 novembre 2022

On 26 July 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant asking about his position on the friendly settlement proposal. By a letter dated 14 October 2019, Mr A.

Source officielle

Page 53 sur 1225

← PrécédentSuivant →