CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

9 536 résultats pour « Pryfer »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

TA

Reconduites à la frontière

DTA_2203084_20221130

Administratif

30 novembre 2022

30 novembre 2022

B D, représenté par Me Ezzaïtab, demande au tribunal : - son admission à l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; - l'annulation de l'arrêté n°PREF-DCL-BSU-2022-256-004 du 13 septembre 2022 par lequel

Source officielle

Page 53 sur 477

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5308

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2002

27 juin 2002

As to the applicant’s argument that, unlike the custom’s authorities, he was required at all times during the forfeiture proceedings to bear the burden of proof, it is not incompatible with the requirement

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13891

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2022

15 novembre 2022

Making criminal convictions conditional upon a high standard of proof and interpreting doubt in this regard in favour of the defendant was both an integral part of the Convention and the European legal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55713

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1999

9 juin 1999

  In their claims for compensation, victims or their heirs shall provide proof of their infection with the human immunodeficiency virus and of the transfusion of blood products or injections of blood

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226269

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2023

10 juillet 2023

Under Article 6 of the Convention, they complain of the reversal of the burden of proof, which allegedly made it impossible for them to prove the lawful origin of the assets.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425JUD003974805

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

The defendants had not provided any other proof that T.’s actions had been unlawful. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1972

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2008

17 juillet 2008

However, to place such a burden of proof on her was to overlook the acknowledged deficiencies in the hospital’s record-keeping at the material time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6980

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2000

9 mai 2000

Law : Article 6 § 1: As with a judge, the subjective impartiality of a juror must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224524

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2023

3 avril 2023

By a final decision of 11 December 2017 the Baku Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance court’s decision, adding that the applicant failed to submit proof showing that her above-mentioned complaints

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224540

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2023

6 avril 2023

In its ruling of 11 May 2022 the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State acknowledged that in situations like these it was difficult for the person concerned to deliver proof ( in

Source officielle
CA

3e chambre sociale

69e1d36dcdc6046d4789e48d

Appel

16 avril 2026

16 avril 2026

COUR D'APPEL DE MONTPELLIER 3e chambre sociale ARRET DU 16 AVRIL 2026 Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général : N° RG 22/04824 - N° Portalis DBVK-V-B7G-PRWF

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11422

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

Law – Article   3 ( substantive aspect ): The Court found it established to the requisite standard of proof that the nursery school staff had subjected the applicant to the treatment complained of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56351

Admin. suprême

24 février 2004

24 février 2004

a certificate under Section 42 of the Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act 1976 constituted a disproportionate restriction of his right of access to a court, as the certificate was an irrefutable proof

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12655

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2019

12 novembre 2019

The pre‑investigation inquiry had not provided the Government with a proper basis to discharge their burden of proof and produce evidence capable of casting doubt on the applicant’s credible allegations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-948

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

Instead, despite the fact that both the applicant and the boy had expressed the wish to remain together as a family, the authorities had laid the burden of proof on the applicant to show that he was able

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2113

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2008

27 mars 2008

They were value judgments and, accordingly, were not susceptible of proof.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11702

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2017

6 juin 2017

As it was not based on any specific evidence, its conclusion that there had been no negligence was to be regarded more as affirmation than as proof.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159291

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2015

17 novembre 2015

Regarding these proceedings, should the burden of proof be shifted from the applicant to the respondent State?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10137

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

while the authenticity of the documents published by the applicant had never been called into question, some of his statements amounted to value judgments, the truth of which was not susceptible of proof

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9933

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

The burden of proof regarding the effectiveness of that remedy would then lie with the respondent State.

Source officielle