The applicant appealed to the Secretary of State against his dismissal on 23 May 1984.

Other relevant factors may include the scope of any admissions made in the declaration and the manner in which the Government intends to provide redress and, depending on the circumstances of each case

The Court observes that the applicant made a substantiated complaint about the alleged violation of her Convention rights, and supported them with sufficient documentation.

By a decision of 14 July 1987, which was made enforceable on 31 July 1991, the Florence Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 31 May 1992.

Since the statements V.T. had made were true, and since they had been made for the protection of justifiable public interest, the District Court found that the statements could not constitute a criminal

On 17 May 1976, Mr and Mrs D. stated that they were unhappy with the girls having contact visits with their brothers, as L.W. had been upset following a visit on 13 May 1976.

  Hungary , no. 31475/05, § 43, 26 May 2009). 25.

I will, of course, consider such an application if it is made.

On 25 May 1999, in a decision of non-jurisdiction, the Diyarbakır public prosecutor referred to the allegations made by the applicant that she had been tortured during interrogation.

She confirmed her confessions made on 30 March 2009 (see paragraph 9 above). 13 .

It awarded EUR   20,000 in compensation and declared that the tenant may no longer rely on the impugned law to maintain title to the property.

An officer may use any means necessary to fulfil the functions of the police ...” 32 .

Therefore, a person who has made a public statement by a public authority may be subject to disciplinary proceedings and disciplinary sanctions for a breach of Article   92 of the Constitution.

According to section 347B(1): (1)     In this section ‘qualifying maintenance payment’ means a periodical payment which - (a)     is made under an order made by a court in a member

A confiscation order for over £1.5 million was made, with provision for a further three years’ imprisonment in the event of non-payment. A receiver was appointed to realise the applicant’s assets.

    By a decision of 5 May 1988, which was made enforceable on the same day, the Rome Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises must be vacated by 30

Challenges to admissibility on such grounds may be made either in advance of the trial or in its course.

  STRASBOURG 27 May 2025   FINAL   27/08/2025   This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

8 December 1999; 10 January; 9 February, 30 March; 12 April; 15 and 25 May; 26 June; 13 July and 9 August 2000.