CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130JUD000351211
30 janvier 2018
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)
Page 53 sur 763
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320JUD002679308
20 mars 2012
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-a - After conviction)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD005521415
14 février 2017
Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023JUD000855517
23 octobre 2018
proceedings concerning his request for release had not complied with the requirement of “speediness” provided for in Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1106JUD005430920
6 novembre 2025
he had previously already been charged with a grave violent offence which meant that the public interest in protecting third parties from violent acts outweighed the rule of respect for individual liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD001973522
27 novembre 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0218JUD007687411
18 février 2016
Thirdly, he argued that there had not been a sufficient “causal connection” between the deprivation of his liberty following his recall and the crime for which he was originally convicted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0313JUD005921721
13 mars 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0425JUD005578820
25 avril 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD002731819
3 février 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0519JUD003412223
19 mai 2026
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1015JUD005876409
15 octobre 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924JUD008359417
24 septembre 2019
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0930JUD000914620
30 septembre 2021
He relied on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194909
2 juillet 2019
In particular, was the deprivation of liberty based on a court order and was there a written record of detention (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria , no.
soc
6079b2099ba5988459c55648
8 avril 1974
, DEFAUT DE REPONSE AUX CONCLUSIONS : ATTENDU QUE LA SOCIETE LA RAQUETTE SYDNEY FAIT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE DE L'AVOIR DEBOUTEE DE SON CONTREDIT FORME CONTRE LA DECISION DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE LIBOURNE
ECLI:CEDH:001-197152
2 octobre 2019
The applicant also alleges that he was unlawfully deprived of his liberty in that he stayed in a police station cell for over seven hours prior to his formal arrest. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
5ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2022:459501.20221228
28 décembre 2022
conciliation et d'indemnisation des accidents médicaux, des affections iatrogènes et des infections nosocomiales (CCI) d'Aquitaine rejetant sa demande d'indemnisation, de condamner le centre hospitalier de Libourne
Tribunal Administratif de Bordeaux
ORTA_2301851_20240412
12 avril 2024
Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 23 février 2024, la commune de Libourne, représentée par son maire en exercice, conclut au rejet de la requête.
2ème CHAMBRE CIVILE
63cb92b79c02507c9078dcbd
19 janvier 2023
le RG 22/5279 Grosse délivrée le : aux avocats Décision déférée à la cour : jugement d'orientation rendu le 11 mars 2022 (R.G. 21/00021) par le Juge de l'exécution de Libourne