also under Article 13 (art. 13) of the Convention;        -   held by nineteen votes to one that the respondent state was to pay to the applicant, in respect of costs and

  The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to a fair trial).

It further held that each party to the proceedings should pay their own costs. 12.

; the twenty companies listed in paragraph 5 above, each of which held between 4.98% and 2.81% of the shares; a Mr B.P., who held 0.19% of the shares; and a Mr P.B., who held 1.20% of the shares (see the

However, the absence of a hearing before a second or third instance may be justified by the special features of the proceedings at issue, provided a hearing has been held at first instance (see Helmers

The applicant’s fellow servicemen then shaved his head and warrant officer G. painted a five-pointed star on his head using brilliant green antiseptic.

The one on the head had been a dull trauma in the left temporal zone, without skin rupturing.

Trauttmansdorff, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs. 3.

As head of the bank’s treasury, the claimant held a position in the management of the bank at the material time, in which he was responsible for authorising foreign currency transactions and answerable

The Court also held, unanimously, that it was unnecessary to examine separately the complaint under Article 13.

  10 Prison where he was held till 14 March 2007.

    The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court established that the applicant had been held in overcrowded cells for just under a year and a half, given that for that duration he had been held

        Between October 1993 and the summer of 1994 the applicant moved M. three times from one school to another.

He explained that the Croatian authorities had been renting his premises and collecting a monthly rent which had so far reached the sum claimed.

with education or a roof over his head. 13.

There were from 7 to 9   inmates held in the cell together with the applicant. From 29   November to 28   December 2012 the applicant was held in cell no.   240.

    From 25 August to 22 September 2009 the applicant was held in the Kyiv City Centre of Forensic Psychiatric Expert Examinations with the aim of clarifying whether he could be held criminally

At the time that report was made, the applicant was undergoing inpatient medical treatment in the SIZO medical unit in connection with the residual effects of the head injury of 2009.

, by eight votes to one, that the orders requiring the applicant's medical advisers to give evidence had not constituted a violation of Article 8 of the Convention; - held, by eight votes to one, that