) the applicant had acted in good faith.

Moreover, although the Administrative Court had found that the identity check had been unlawful, it had considered that the question whether the applicant’s skin colour had played a decisive role in the

  July 2003 had been justified.

He had refused, saying that he had no idea where to look for Luiza and had tried to reassure Ms R.T. that Luiza had left of her own free will.

Then the applicant had been taken to a basement, where he had found Murad Gelayev and Mr Sul.S. The intruders had forced the detainees to put their hands on the table and had hit them with bludgeons.

, who had resisted, had been killed.

, and (ii)   the defence had not indicated any questions to which the answer had not already been available in the main case file.

The applicant’s condition had started to give cause for alarm in October 2010. By that time, he had no longer been in prison but had been admitted to the prison wing of the hospital.

The letter in question had contained whole passages taken from the letter which the applicant had written to the Supreme Council of the Judiciary complaining about Judge X’s conduct, and had summarised

partner had given birth.

His defence lawyer had remained in the courtroom and had presented the applicant’s closing arguments.

the question of the independence of that commission since it had had no influence on the conduct of the ongoing criminal investigation.

He had unsuccessfully tried to calm them down and then had gone back into the restaurant.

The Health Inspectorate had, inter alia , observed that on the day of the inspection healthcare had been provided by uncertified nurses who, moreover, had had a very heavy workload.

He had not hidden in the ladies’ toilets but had gone there because the men’s toilets had been in a state excluding their use.

The relevant legislative amendments had been widely debated in society and the applicants’ allegations that they had not been adequately discussed had been dismissed by Constitutional Court.

d'un arrêt rendu le 2 février 1999 par la cour d'appel de Bourges (1e chambre civile), au profit : 1 / de la SCI Le Dournon, société civile immobilière, dont le siège est ..., 2 / de la société Hades

She had stated that her father had received all the money she had been granted as financial support, to which she had only had limited access.

had been in breach of the Act.