plan de la Société HOLDING GROUPE VIALLE, domicilié "Le mercurial" - 78 rue Victor Hugo - 24000 PÉRIGUEUX Comparant volontairement Représenté par Maître VERGNE, Avocat substituant Maître Patrick ENGEL

Court H.R., Engel and others judgment of 6 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 38, para. 91; Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89).

D.H., arrêt Engel du 8 juin 1976, série A n° 22, pp. 34-35, par. 82 ; arrêt Öztürk du 21 février 1984, série A n° 73, pp. 17-18, par. 49).

penalty – in his case, fifteen days’ imprisonment – rather than the actual penalty imposed which was the decisive element for classification of an offence as “criminal” (he referred to the cases of Engel

In assessing this issue, the Court is not bound by the indications furnished by domestic law, which have only a relative value (see the following judgments: Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June

  Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 November 1976, Series A no. 22, pp. 34-35, para. 82 _______________           The Court has adopted the

     The Court was confronted with a similar issue in the case of Engel and others, which was cited in argument by the representatives.

    The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 1 protects the physical liberty of the person (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, §   58, Series A no. 22; Guzzardi v.

    The Court’s established case-law sets out three criteria, commonly known as the “ Engel criteria” (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8   June 1976, §   85, Series  

    The Court of Cassation examined in detail the statutory provisions governing demolition orders, also in the light of the Court’s relevant case ‑ law (namely Engel and Others v. the

Öztürk was a "criminal" one, the Court referred to the criteria adopted in its judgment of 8 June 1976 in the case of Engel and Others (Series A no. 22, pp. 34-35, § 82).

However, the list set out in Article 14 is illustrative and not exhaustive, as is shown by the words “any ground such as” (in French “ notamment ”) (see Engel and Others , cited above, § 72; and Carson

Ireland (no. 3) , 1 July 1961, pp. 51-53, §   14, Series A no. 3, and, mutatis mutandis , Ječius , cited above, §§ 50-51, and Engel and Others v.

§ 1 of Protocol No. 7 on the basis outlined above, the question arose whether a disqualification order under section 142 of the Bankruptcy Act must be considered a “criminal matter” under the three Engel

criteria” (that is, the legal classification under domestic law, the nature of the offence and the degree of severity of the penalty – see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8   June 1976, Series

CREDIPAR représentée par son conseil, se rapportant oralement à ses conclusions signifiées par la voie électronique le 25 février 2021, demande à la Cour de : - prononcer la jonction des trois affaires enrélees

Vu la procédure suivante : Procédure devant la cour : Par une requête et un mémoire enregistrés le 8 août 2022 et le 25 juin 2025, la société par actions simplifiée Capeole, représentée par Me Enkell

Since the applicant had a clean record, he was given a warning ( enkele waarschuwing ).

        Le requérant fut renvoyé en jugement devant le tribunal de Milan dans les affaires Eni-Sai, Banco Ambrosiano, Enimont, Metropolitana Milanese, Cariplo et Enel.