Subsequently, she was called on to produce an identity card. The applicant did not comply but removed the tealight candles and sought to leave the site.

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15 January 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; the Committee of Ministers is now called

  §   2 In the light of the Government's submissions, which have not sought to justify the prohibition and having regard to the Court's case-law, a re-examination of this question is not called

Reasonableness of the length of proceedings: to be assessed with reference to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law and in the light of the circumstances of the case, which in the cases under review called

No. 9 but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15   January 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

Reasonableness of the length of proceedings: to be assessed with reference to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law and in the light of the circumstances of the case, which in the cases under review called

The European Court was therefore called upon to re-examine the issue.

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 5   August 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 May 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

On 27 January and 6 February 2023, the Castellon de la Plana Employment Tribunal no. 5 sent so-called certified faxes ( burofaxes ) to summon the applicant company, but allegedly to a wrong address.

criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings - to be determined with reference to criteria laid down in Court's case-law and in the light of the circumstances of the case, which in this instance called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 5 August 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

left his cell: violation Facts – The applicant was sentenced to life imprisonment without commutation on various charges, including aggravated murder, and ordered to serve his sentence under the so-called

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 21   October 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

issued in accordance with the legal requirements and that, although the police officer had become aware, a few days before the shooting, of material the gunman had published on the Internet, he had called

In the process of the investigation, on 27 July 2019 the applicant was called to the police station to provide a supplementary statement.

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15 September 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

in accordance with Protocol No. 9 but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 16 May 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called