More specifically, the Court held that, because of the protracted failure of the State to build and deliver the flats to which the applicants were entitled under decisions for compensation for expropriated

First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Greece, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President ,   Ledi Bianku,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre

The applicant was tried in his absence because his whereabouts were unknown to the authorities.

By a letter of 17 November 2006, the investigating judge informed the public prosecutor that the first applicant had not been examined because he had not appeared in court owing to illness.

Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Päivi Hirvelä,   Ledi Bianku,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre

She had been restricted in her ability to prepare her defence because of limited access to the case file.

sitting on 27   March 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Bazarbiyevich BAKIYEV against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 20   October 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Linos-Alexandre

It is further argued that to make a reduction in the award because of the number of claimants would send the wrong signal to claimants who brought joint proceedings before the domestic courts and would

    The Government argued that the applicants had lost their victim status because the authorities had taken the necessary protective measures and rectified the situations complained of.

These objections were identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v. Turkey ((merits), no. 16162/90, §§ 11-22, 20   January 2009).

The judgment became final on 10 February 1996. 8.     The applicant served his full prison sentence until 18 February 2002.

A person who has been granted asylum in Russia because of possible political persecution in the State seeking his extradition may not be extradited to that State (Article 464 § 1 (2)). 28.

Four witnesses testified that the physics department had not held a meeting for the election of delegates to the conference or nomination of candidates to the senate because the delegates and candidates

No remedies were exercised against that judgment which, thus, became final. 7.

    The applicant brought proceedings against the OE-256/4 correctional colony for compensation for damage incurred because of the above-mentioned violations.

They sought compensation for non-pecuniary damage because their relatives had been killed as a result of the attack, and because they and their relatives had been wounded.

According to the Ombudsman, this problem proved to be more important in northern Greece because of the refusal of the Thessaloniki judicial prison to accept a greater number of inmates.